Batmannerism
Super-unknown
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
- Messages
- 7,096
- Reaction score
- 4,766
- Points
- 103
Am I supposed to laugh every time Zod's on screen?
If you take Zod totally seriously you're missing out. He's intentionally OTT.
Am I supposed to laugh every time Zod's on screen?
If BR is not good, then B89 isn't either.The first one is pretty good even with all its kinks, it makes it all the more disappointing that Batman Returns plummeted down so hard coming from the same writer(s).
At least you're aware that BR is not good.
B89 is still significantly better than Baskin Robins.If BR is not good, then B89 isn't either.
I never tried Baskin Robins, so you probably know better.B89 is still significantly better than Baskin Robins.
If you take Zod totally seriously you're missing out. He's intentionally OTT.
The schoolyard bully approach does not work. I'm looking it at the same way we endear Tommy Wiseau.Superman II is the best superhero sequel of the last century. And you shouldn't laugh at Zod, he's pretty threatening and serious.
Aside from 'KNEEL' Zod is rather nuanced.The schoolyard bully approach does not work. I'm looking it at the same way we endear Tommy Wiseau.
Batman Returns is the intentionally OTT one
and Burton was up there with Raimi in knowing how to walk that tightrope.
I recall mentioning Zod literally acting like a schoolyard bully in another thread.Aside from 'KNEEL' Zod is rather nuanced.
I know you don't like this one, but an example of a properly written movie that goes over the top is Thor: Ragnarok, and it is fantastic. Over the top is not the same as off storytelling, and it's not an excuse for it either.
The schoolyard bully approach does not work. I'm looking it at the same way we endear Tommy Wiseau.
Batman Returns is the intentionally OTT one
and Burton was up there with Raimi in knowing how to walk that tightrope.
Can't find the clip, but it's when Zod calls Supes a coward. Went through some other clips and I'm having trouble keep up with why this is the best 20th century superhero sequel (mainstream & otherwise).First, I'm not sure if I think of Zod as a schoolyard bully - a bully , yes, but schoolyard isn't the adjective that comes to mind.
Second I agree that BR was intentionally OTT, as was Batman 89, but I feel as though Burton went too far in BR with the first born subplot ( his goons were like the child catcher from Chitty Shotty Bang Bang) and the kamikaze penguins. He got the balance right in '89 but not in BR, which is why it is largely an inferior film - with Pfeiffer's amazing Catwoman being the stand out improvement.
It may be nostalgia but I could watch Batman '89 any day. When I was at uni my flatmates and I didn't have a real TV, just an old computer monitor hooked up to a VHS, and the only tape we actually owned was Batman - needless to say it got played a lot.
. When I saw BR back in the day I was a lot younger and there was no TDK or MCU for comparison - and I loved it (although I found it ridiculous). Years later it hasn't held up that well ( except for Catwoman) but that's okay , it's still fun to watch now and then. If you really enjoy it, more power to you, I respect your opinion.
i was entertained. It wasn't The Dark Knight, but it sure as bad place wasn't Batman and Robin.Suicide Squad is good.
i was entertained. It wasn't The Dark Knight, but it sure as bad place wasn't Batman and Robin.
I found goodfellas kind of frustrating. (flame shields up!)
Suicide Squad is good.
That's why I watch Casino instead.
You sort of answered your own question. Goodfellas lite. It's less about relentless thuggery, prisons. Easier watch.Really ? I think of Casino as Goodfellas lite. Joe Pesci plays virtually the same character in both movies - but has a more awful death in Casino.
Goodfellas is still the best mob film since The Godfather - but not easy to watch IMO.
Superman II is the best superhero sequel of the last century. And you shouldn't laugh at Zod, he's pretty threatening and serious.
Batman Returns has a very rushed and superficial romance compared to the first, that is for starters.
Penguin lives in the sewers that are part of the Zoo river and has a lot of access to henchmen, technology, knowledge of all kinds, tape, toxic waste, etc etc....
Having the batmobile schematics makes zero sense, and Batman punching through the reinforced bottom breaking it makes even less sense.
Why did Gordon decide to flash the signal instead of calling more cops early in the movie? And how does Batman know where to go?
Penguin's move by remote control?
Waterproof technology, and a giant duck elevator that goes up and fully appears out of a small manhole.
Max Schreck telling his son that he tossed Selina out of the window to call her is ridiculous and unnecessary.
Chip Schreck is almost completely useless and superfluous.
Catwoman's origin is sooooo dumb, even before inspiring that trash Catwoman movie from 2004.
Why did Batman stare at one victim for long while he was saving civilians and property?
Bulletproof vest can be pierced by that small cheap custom added claw.
All those effing umbrellas and the gadgets they contain, and they are owned by some vagrant in the sewers.
And more.
That's why I watch Casino instead.