DJ_KiDDvIcIOUs
Avenger
- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 25,025
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 33
Canadian politician caught on camera peeing into mug at constituents home
I don't know what the **** anymore.
Earths hottest layer is the core, we use uranium to build nukes, and ocean tides are created by the gravitational pull of the Moon. Like, duh! But did you also know that the boiling point of water decreases with increasing altitude, or that amplitude determines the loudness of a sound wave? Huh?
Maybe youre a smartypants who did know all those sciencey facts. (Or youre going to tell me you did, regardless). But if so, youre ahead of the curve, according to a new Pew Research Study that polled 3,278 adults on 12 basic science questions.
![]()
Overall, Americans gave more correct than incorrect answers good! And unsurprisingly, people with college or graduate degrees got the most questions right. But only 6% of survey respondents received a perfect score, suggesting that some pieces of common knowledge arent so common, after all such as how light travels through a magnifying glass.
And there are a few widespread misconceptions that Im trying really hard not to smash my face against a wall over. For instance, nearly a quarter of survey respondents said that astronomy is the study of how the positions of stars and planets can influence human behavior. Im sorry, but thats a different field of study entirely its called ********. Write that one down.
Of course, the questions in the Pew survey represent only teensy tiny slice of basic scientific knowledge, and a rather physical-sciencey one. That bias could explain why men tended to score slightly higher than women previous Pew research surveys note that gender gaps on scientific knowledge disappear on health and biomedical topics:
![]()
But despite its limitations, the survey does manage to tease out some interesting patterns. For instance, the vast majority of young people know that radio waves transmit cell phone calls, while only 57% of adults over the age of 65 have figured this out. On the other hand, adults aged 65 and older schooled Americans youth when it comes to correctly identifying the developer of the polio vaccine (hint: it wasnt Einstein).
Wait, so....young people are into technology and bored by history? Okay, maybe we already knew that. Read the full report and take the interactive quiz, now that Ive given you half the answers!
Another "stupid Americans" poll. Not that I'm exactly doubting it but I also wonder how well these things stack up against other countries. As in, how many of those countries have equally "stupid" people in them?
I guess I'm a smarty pants since I knew the answers to those questions they asked, although I haven't taken the whole survey yet so maybe I just knew that handful, or maybe the survey was just poorly executed. Nobody would care if it stated "Americans were smart, knew most answers correctly" afterall.
Its good to know that people are focusing on whats really important. Local governments in a few different U.S. cities and towns have looked past the problems of homelessness, crumbling city services and displacement, to tackle the real crisis: people are putting up tiny take a book, leave a book libraries.
This is clearly a major crisis in our culture, and one that can only be addressed by the full busy-bodiness of local busybodies.
As The Atlantics Conor Friedersdorf explains, local governments in Los Angeles, Shreveport, LA and Leawood, KS have all tried to levy fines and other sanctions against people who put up these tiny birdhouse-like lending libraries. These are just what they sound like: tiny boxes on stilts, where anybody can leave behind a book, or take one of the books that have been left behind by others. They bring pleasure and excitement, and a badly needed sense of civic participation and shared fun, to communities, and most of all, they encourage people to notice and read books. But they violate obscure zoning and other ordinances.
In the case of Los Angeles, city officials did say that the tiny library could stay if its creators applied for a permit, which could be funded through local arts organizations. As Friedersdorf points out:
This is what conservatives and libertarians mean when they talk about overregulation disincentivizing or displacing voluntary activity that benefits people. Weve constructed communities where one must obtain prior permission from agents of the state before freely sharing books with ones neighbors! And their proposed solution is to get scarce public art funds to pay for the needless layer of bureaucracy being imposed on the thing already being done for free.
The power to require permits is the power to prevent something from ever existing. This lovely movement would've never begun or spread if everyone who wanted to build a Little Free Library recognized a need to apply and pay for a permit. Instead they did good and asked permission never.
In Shreveport, one woman created her own small free range library on her front yard, as a protest after the little free library was sanctioned by the cityand her civil disobedience paid off, with the city backing down and agreeing to pass a new resolution exempting the libraries from regulations. But even if they create a special exemption, its bizarre and ridiculous that these awesome little community projects ever needed permission in the first place.
Day care center staff charged with running 'fight club'
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/02/day-care-center-fight-club/71576072/
Baby brawling. Place your bets !

Local Governments Crack Down On The Monstrous Evil of Tiny Free Lending Libraries
It's because you're not allowed to do anything without the government getting their cut. Like that guy who built his own self-sufficient home and was shut down because it was "unsafe".
I was with this until that guy Friedersdorf started spouting off all that awful libertarian (he really missed a chance to pun librarian) and conservative ********. It has nothing to do with politics everything to do with bureaucrats who will be there regardless of your governmenting preferences.Local Governments Crack Down On The Monstrous Evil of Tiny Free Lending Libraries
http://io9.com/local-governments-crack-down-on-the-monstrous-evil-of-t-1729930863
We must prevent the serfs from reading lest they gain knowledge and rise against us!
When Louisiana state officials announced their plans to terminate Planned Parenthoods state Medicaid contract in late August, they argued that there were plenty of doctors who could take on the more than 5200 patients the reproductive health organization sees each year in New Orleans and Baton Rouge.
They even provided a list of those doctors to the US District Court when Planned Parenthood filed suit against the state (Planned Parenthood argues that breaking the contract is a violation of federal law). Its an impressive 37 pages long, including 1146 Medicaid providers near New Orleans and 864 near Baton Rouge.
But actually reading their list reveals that very few of those doctors are qualified to give pelvic exams, provide contraceptives, or administer screenings for STDs or breast and cervical cancer. The list is actually of every provider who takes Medicaid in the regionincluding dentists, along with anesthesiologists, eye doctors, radiologists, cardiologists, pharmacies, and nursing homes.
The Hon. John W. DeGravelles, who will decide whether it is legal for the state to break their contract with Planned Parenthood, was not amused. From the court transcript of September 2, 2015:
![]()
The Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals submitted a revised list of providers on September 8. This list is much shorter. It includes just 29 providers, 24 of which provide the same range of services as Planned Parenthood. Only five providers are in Baton Rouge; two have three-week waits for new patients, and one is not accepting new patients.
DeGravelles is expected to rule on the case September 15th.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/comm...ted-after-taking-homemade-clock-to-school.eceAhmed Mohamed — who makes his own radios and repairs his own go-kart — hoped to impress his teachers when he brought a homemade clock to MacArthur High on Monday.
Instead, the school phoned police about Ahmed’s circuit-stuffed pencil case.
He loved robotics club in middle school and was searching for a similar niche in his first few weeks of high school. So he decided to do what he’s always done: He built something.
Ahmed’s clock was hardly his most elaborate creation. He said he threw it together in about 20 minutes before bed on Sunday: a circuit board and power supply wired to a digital display, all strapped inside a case with a tiger hologram on the front. He kept the clock inside his school bag in English class, but the teacher complained when the alarm beeped in the middle of a lesson. Ahmed brought his invention up to show her afterward.
“She was like, it looks like a bomb,” he said.
“I told her, ‘It doesn’t look like a bomb to me.’”
The teacher kept the clock. When the principal and a police officer pulled Ahmed out of sixth period, he suspected he wouldn’t get it back.
They led Ahmed into a room where four other police officers waited. He said an officer he’d never seen before leaned back in his chair and remarked: “Yup. That’s who I thought it was.”
Ahmed felt suddenly conscious of his brown skin and his name — one of the most common in the Muslim religion. But the police kept him busy with questions.
Police led Ahmed out of MacArthur about 3 p.m., his hands cuffed behind him and an officer on each arm. A few students gaped in the halls. He remembers the shocked expression of his student counselor — the one “who knows I’m a good boy.”
That school is going to be sued into oblivion. Not only is what they did illegal, but it is racist as ****. That kid is about to own that school.