There is no superior. Women and men both have strengths and weaknesses and that balances us out as a species to make us equals. Third wave feminism, like this shows says, HA!, see men, we are better than you. It's childish. I was raised by only women and my mother was the strongest person I have ever met in my life. But that doesn't make my father useless. He wasn't a great parent but his strengths in other aspects of his life are inspiring to me. We all have strengths and weaknesses.
It says a lot when a woman is portrayed as strong and equal to men, that you leap to them being portrayed as "superior".
This is beginning to really piss me off.
I guess I've just seen Supergirl declared to be more powerful than Superman in several media/continuities now, so it's already been an accepted fact in my head for a while. When you add to that the fact that she has two years worth of professional training that he doesn't on this show, it makes perfect sense that the fight turned out the way it did to me. The being who's A.) already more powerful and B.) has better training is the one more likely to win, even when you leave out the fact that it's her show.
To me what made Superman look great was the way he handled it, like he was just so proud of her, because that's who Superman is to me: a beacon of humility and grace. Which is why she was still the one looking up to him the whole ep, getting advice, asking him to teach her some moves...because what makes someone a hero or the leader isn't who can beat whom in a fight - it's being the person people look to for strength.
Basically, Supergirl has been said to be more powerful than Superman in different continuities in the comics, and each one offered a different explanation. In one, it was because her father put solar lamps in her pod, so when she was lost in space all those years she was getting extreme yellow sun exposure that strengthened her cells. In another, it was that her body converts the yellow sun radiation at a faster rate because she grew up on Krypton so her body evolved under Krypton's sun/harsher gravity/atmosphere, or something like that. In an animated version, it was just that her cells were denser. Either way, it's a common trope from comics and other media that she is more powerful than him, for whatever pseudo-science-y explanation they decide to go with that week, lol.
USUALLY, however, he is able to best her in a fight because he has more experience, and in those continuities, she is still pretty new to Earth and her powers. That is not necessarily the case in this show, because while he has been Superman for over 12 years and she's only been Supergirl for 2, she has gotten daily professional training for those two years - specifically to fight other trained Kryptonians, I might add - that he was never interested in because it would mean he'd have to work for the DEO. So most of his time being Superman was spent doing the usual feats of strength/brains and straight brawling on the rare occasion he had a foe that matched him in power. Though he did apparently have an adventure on Warworld where he learned some moves.
So while they should be rather evenly matched, it is certainly conceivable that between being the already more powerful one and having had more focused training, she could be able to best him. That said, I agree with you the knockout punch was poorly executed and should not have been able to take him out. That whole bit in the water was poorly executed, imo, as I think it was supposed to be showing the gravity of each of their punches and why they were exhausting themselves, but it didn't really translate. They should have done a series of super-speed punches instead of going slo-mo, then ending on a proper upper-cut (instead of a back-handed one), imo.
But for the record, to answer another one of your questions, YES, the strength of superheroes DOES tend to fluctuate from different movies/comics/etc. depending on who's writing it, and whose story it is. So it really is barely worth asking, lol.
No problem.Thanks so much for taking the time! This was like exactly what I was looking for.
Basically, Supergirl has been said to be more powerful than Superman in different continuities in the comics, and each one offered a different explanation.
^In that story, she still appears more powerful, because as you said, he's got those subconscious mental blocks and she doesn't, which would also apply here. Also, I don't know when it was, but I do know Batman also stated at some point that she does indeed absorb solar radiation at a faster rate, due to having grown up on Krypton's environment instead of Earth. And of course, they didn't nix the idea in the animated version at all - it stuck. And in the New 52 she was also said to be more powerful by the Worldkillers who'd been observing them for a while. And hell, I know you debated this, the fact is on Smallville she developed all her powers pretty much immediately after she landed while Clark didn't, so for whatever the reason at the time, she appeared to be more powerful than him there as well. The point is, it's a recurring idea/question in canon, and not something these writers just made up or is any less valid or more "outrageous" than any other interpretation. Your interpretation's just as valid too, of course.
If Superman had won the fight, would you still be complaining about him being shown as "superior"?She wasn't portrayed as equal to, they explicitly say she is better than, in every area. I'm asking for equality, meaning equal to, not greater than. Both have strengths and weaknesses as characters, been like that since forever in the comics. I don't care if it pisses you off, not my problem. You have no cause for complaint.
If Superman had won the fight, would you still be complaining about him being shown as "superior"?
Basically, Supergirl has been said to be more powerful than Superman in different continuities in the comics, and each one offered a different explanation. In one, it was because her father put solar lamps in her pod, so when she was lost in space all those years she was getting extreme yellow sun exposure that strengthened her cells. In another, it was that her body converts the yellow sun radiation at a faster rate because she grew up on Krypton so her body evolved under Krypton's sun/harsher gravity/atmosphere, or something like that. In an animated version, it was just that her cells were denser. Either way, it's a common trope from comics and other media that she is more powerful than him, for whatever pseudo-science-y explanation they decide to go with that week, lol.
USUALLY, however, he is able to best her in a fight because he has more experience, and in those continuities, she is still pretty new to Earth and her powers. That is not necessarily the case in this show, because while he has been Superman for over 12 years and she's only been Supergirl for 2, she has gotten daily professional training for those two years - specifically to fight other trained Kryptonians, I might add - that he was never interested in because it would mean he'd have to work for the DEO. So most of his time being Superman was spent doing the usual feats of strength/brains and straight brawling on the rare occasion he had a foe that matched him in power. Though he did apparently have an adventure on Warworld where he learned some moves.
So while they should be rather evenly matched
It is certainly conceivable that between being the already more powerful one and having had more focused training, she could be able to best him. That said, I agree with you the knockout punch was poorly executed and should not have been able to take him out. That whole bit in the water was poorly executed, imo, as I think it was supposed to be showing the gravity of each of their punches and why they were exhausting themselves, but it didn't really translate. They should have done a series of super-speed punches instead of going slo-mo, then ending on a proper upper-cut (instead of a back-handed one), imo.
I didn't like the finale but thank the gods Mon-El,is gone. I'm fine with Superman losing to Supergirl. However the way he acted afterward rubs me the wrong way. Him being gracious in the loss is fine but where is his ego? I imagine superheroes have the mindset of a world class athlete. There are no athletes at the top of their game who take losing well. In fact anyone with any ounce of competive spirit doesn't take losses well. So I find his lack of any emotion,really makes him come off to me like a neutered dog. This Superman doesn't have any fire in him whatsoever.
I didn't like the finale but thank the gods Mon-El,is gone. I'm fine with Superman losing to Supergirl. However the way he acted afterward rubs me the wrong way. Him being gracious in the loss is fine but where is his ego? I imagine superheroes have the mindset of a world class athlete. There are no athletes at the top of their game who take losing well. In fact anyone with any ounce of competive spirit doesn't take losses well. So I find his lack of any emotion,really makes him come off to me like a neutered dog. This Superman doesn't have any fire in him whatsoever.
No they shoudn't be at all. Experience aside, Clark has 20 year of sunlight on Kara, so by the internal logic of the superman mythology more sunlight = more power and 2 decades of sunlight equals ALOT more power.
I'm not going to address all the comics stuff as I have already addressed that in other posts, and frankly, I find debating the nitty gritty explanations for "my hero would beat your hero" to be a bunch of hooey that just suits the writers' needs at the time, whatever they are. For example, you can just as easily argue that he should be stronger because he's been under the yellow sun longer, just as I can easily argue he's blown out his powers several times, so that "extra charge" could be gone. AND I could go with the argument that Kara's body evolved under Krypton's red sun and harsher environment and therefore her cells have a more extreme reaction to the yellow sun and absorb the solar radiation at a faster rate (another argument that's been made in the comics at some point). And at the end of the day, both arguments are a bunch of fake science BS that don't mean a damn thing. I made my point: The argument has been made in multiple iterations that she has the potential to be more powerful, and this show's writers are perfectly within their rights to run with that. You are welcome to disagree but that's the last I'll say on that topic.Have to disagree there, the only version of supergirl that was acknowledged to be more powerful than superman was the new 52 one and even then she couldn't best him in a fight due to his experience.
In Jeph Loeb's run Batman speculated that she was more powerful but when kara turned evil and started beating the JLA and wreck shop Superman let loose and put her on her butt after letting her know that he could beat her anytime.
In STAS her cellular density attributed to kryptonite having less of an effect on her and not her being more powerful because in Legacy Superman nearly killed her with one blow.
That's pure speculation on your part, unless we see a superman prequel show in the near future (hopefully not) I doubt we can gather any credible info on how experienced he is fighting wise.
Like you said we know that he's learned certain moves on warworld where one could speculate that he fought the likes of Draaga (who beat the crap out of Kara) and Mongul. We know for sure that he fought Zod and Maxima previously so one can't jump to the conclusion that he rarely fought beings within his power level.
No they shoudn't be at all. Experience aside, Clark has 20 year of sunlight on Kara, so by the internal logic of the superman mythology more sunlight = more power and 2 decades of sunlight equals ALOT more power.
Again pure speculation, the DEO isn't the only place where one could get training, in the comics superman learned a certain form of kryptonian martial art in the fortress of solitude during the whole messy dominus storyline.
Besides how many times did we actually see kara train in hand to hand combat? twice maybe?
Again I have no problem with supergirl beating him in a fight simply because it's her show and that's a good enough of a reason for me personally, because otherwise nothing she has done within her vast year and a half of experience would warrant her becoming numero uno.
It didn't do that though....at least within this particular story line.
Yes, Cat is over the top feminist. Unapologetic, etc... but as far as the story line of this particular episode, they didn't do that... I didn't see Superman coming off weak AT ALL, not even in the slightest. He came off as strong, caring, with a load of empathy for Kara. It was really nice to watch.
I think you got it totally wrong on this count, and unfortunately ended up missing some fantastic aspects of Superman that we don't always get to see.