Lencho01
Shazoogle! Shazoogle!
- Joined
- May 19, 2010
- Messages
- 29,726
- Reaction score
- 3,002
- Points
- 103
They're certainly better off growing out of Supes because they've covered more ground regarding him than I ever thought possible.
For a cinematic universe, I too have said before that I'm not big on the episodic approach. I'd rather see a more continuous story because sprinkled in connections isn't going to do much for me looking to see characters and story grow. I have also made the connection to IM2, difference is I prefer their "IM2" because it's more thorough and actually eventful.
But the animated series I stick around with have a serialized enough quality to them whether things develop in the foreground or background. This means the few Marvel shows right before Ultimate S-M and its universe took over, which is closer to the MCU than I would like. Phase 3 has definitely gotten better about it.
I don't think they've done much with Superman. For me it's more like "a whole lot of nothing" in that sure, there was much story since they've had him in three films so far, but it didn't amount to much for me. And there's a lot of stuff they could've touched for us to see on the big screen for the first time that they didn't do or didn't do well enough. But, that's just me.
I still find the world building to be rough when it came to IM2. With how WB went about it, I feel it's the same level. But, I can see how one could view it as being smoother than the IM2 approach.
Oh, ok. Yeah, I see what you mean in terms of episodic mixed with serialized approach when the story calls for it. To be honest, part of me felt after the TDKT, WB would've tried to have successful trilogies for their characters. At least with Supes, WW, and whatever new Batman they would've eventually created (that wasn't Batfleck at the time). And then eventually some JL film (maybe before the new Batman trilogy). Kinda like how the DCAU grew beyond BTAS over time.