Discussion in 'DC Comics' started by Johnny DC, Mar 16, 2006.
Heres to hoping
doesn't work unless they have that font on their computer as well.
Damn…Guess I’ll have to link them to the site…Ruins the surpriseL
Lying in the Gutters actually raised a good point. This year without powers means that Superman theoretically should be able to have a kid with Lois. Maybe that's what those three words that change his life forever are after all. I'd actually enjoy that personally.
Mxyzptlk kept insinuating that Clark and Lois could have a baby on the way in Rucka's Adventures of Superman run. Given that Rucka's a major player on the "new" OYL DC universe, I'd say it's a good bet.
you know what would be funny, if darkside kidnapped the baby and raised him as his own. that'll be hilarious. ( i got the plot from an episode of the adventures of superman cartoon.
That's why I also think if they have a baby in the comics, Then The Kid in the upcoming Movie must also be Lois & Clark's kid .
another reason why not to see the film.
They talked about Clark and Lois on their panels. Please tell me that ain't breaking up.
Their not going to break up, The chances of that happing are A Million to One.
Q: Any babies in the future for Clark and Lois, or is the marriage going to get shakier after "Crisis"?
Matt Idelson: Well, Clark's got that baby with Catwoman... joke. The issue of having children is something that will come up, to be certain. I don't foresee the marriage getting shaky. Frankly, the odds of them breaking up are right up there with me becoming an astronaut, and I think the readers know that (the first part, at least). Why waste their time teasing that the marriage is going to crumble when we all know it's not? We've got plenty of other fun, dramatic things to focus on instead.
Thats great...as if the boring marriage werent bad enough, now superbaby is on the way....
I love their Marriage, It's byfar The Best Superhero couple ever. As for The Superbaby. It's about bloody time, they have a child.
Their marriage is usually anything but boring, but yeah, the potential of a baby kinda sucks. A LOT.
but wouldn't the baby be normal since during this time Superman was a human.
What's so wrong with a baby, other than the fact that it'd likely be the most neglected child on the planet?
i just dont see the point of giving them a baby.
You dont like the Superman family to much do you?
I don't know about GAH, but I just don't like children that much.
Me either, in real life. But the emotional subplots that a kid can provide in a narrative are pretty interesting, and it'd be some of that nice, long-sought-after new material that people claim Superman needs so much.
i dunno how a baby can make the supermanm mythos any better
hey look we have a baby, omg he has powers....... i can tell you right now this new "material aint gonna last long" and i hope if they do have a baby, that its a boy. the only person taht should stay away from having abies, is bruce. i just cant see it. and dont give me that itll be cool to see him with a baby, when there are couples out there, who dont even wana have children, so i rather have bruce be wanna those people.
Well Grant Morrison is giving Bruce a kid. I think they are putting Son of the Demon back into continuity. Which means bruce has a 12-16 year old son.
as longasits not a baby, its cool with me, i just dont want him having a damn baby.
You mean you dont want to read about or see him raise a baby but your okay with him having kids.
Maybe this means they'll stop killing Robins