Ugh. Just reading this made me remember how much I still prefer the original ending. Yes, it's controversial and some would say that it goes against everything Cameron intended but he isn't coming back to the franchise and a new direction for the franchise is necessary.
Yeah, but it would have sucked.![]()
So a "new direction" for the franchise at the expense of basically taking a s**t on every thing Cameron established in his films?
Both endings are terrible. I think they should've stuck with the Ferris/Brancato script and changed the ending to Connor dissapearing and being presumed dead in the mayhem of the action, while Marcus takes his identity because no one knows what Connor looks like. That way the story moves forward and there's places to take the sequels.
Both endings are terrible. I think they should've stuck with the Ferris/Brancato script and changed the ending to Connor dissapearing and being presumed dead in the mayhem of the action, while Marcus takes his identity because no one knows what Connor looks like. That way the story moves forward and there's places to take the sequels.
Both endings are terrible. I think they should've stuck with the Ferris/Brancato script and changed the ending to Connor dissapearing and being presumed dead in the mayhem of the action, while Marcus takes his identity because no one knows what Connor looks like. That way the story moves forward and there's places to take the sequels.
That killed me. During the Connor/T-800 fight, it just throws Connor around like a ragdoll, yet, the T-800 can go whoop Marcus' ass with a damn cinder block and punch his heart...yeah Marcus...a dude who is randomly there and not #2 on the Skynet kill list.
![]()
)Saw it last night. Good, but not a great movie. Unfortunately, a great movie was what it needed to be. I thought Bale, Worthington and Yelchin were really strong in it, the effects were good... and as far as post-apolocalyptic movies go, it's certainly one of the best looking. The story was okay, but only if you're willing to pretty much throw logic out the window. Some of the dialogue was pretty awful, but I try not to nitpick that kind of thing too often, simply because well, in real life, people rarely have anything profound to say in regular conversation. All in all, it's entertaining, but I couldn't help but want something more than that.
Ugh. Just reading this made me remember how much I still prefer the original ending. Yes, it's controversial and some would say that it goes against everything Cameron intended but he isn't coming back to the franchise and a new direction for the franchise is necessary.
Otherwise we'll keep getting movies like Rise of the Machines and Salvation (although the original way it was supposed to turn out sounds far better and would have made for a better film imo).
Agreed.Yeah, I'm sorry... but there's a 1000 things horribly terribly wrong with the original ending. John Connor dies and is replaced by a robot (thus making John Connor replaceable)? Skynet is trying to save mankind?
No. Just no.
Agreed, both of those ending are bad.Both endings are terrible. I think they should've stuck with the Ferris/Brancato script and changed the ending to Connor dissapearing and being presumed dead in the mayhem of the action, while Marcus takes his identity because no one knows what Connor looks like. That way the story moves forward and there's places to take the sequels.
There are good ways you can explore Skynet wanting to save humanity in its own way. It's just that the way they originally wanted to do that sounds incredibly stupid.
I was opposed to the original ending as it destroys the original mythoes. Clearly Connor is not that important if a robot can replace him. Still, I left the theater wanting that ending. Simply because, thematically, it was more fitting. The Chud review hit the nail on the head. Its like they built up to the original ending, and then didn't carry through. The script wasn't changed enough for the new ending to be effective.
I was opposed to the original ending as it destroys the original mythoes. Clearly Connor is not that important if a robot can replace him. Still, I left the theater wanting that ending. Simply because, thematically, it was more fitting. The Chud review hit the nail on the head. Its like they built up to the original ending, and then didn't carry through. The script wasn't changed enough for the new ending to be effective.
You bring up a good point here. My guess is it would just be Connor's face which just makes me hate that ending even more.I don't think a robot taking Connor's place would diminish Connor. It really depends on how the transfer took place, would it just be Connor's face or would his personality and memories also be downloaded into Marcus?
It becomes an issue of the symbol overtaking the actual person which has happened a lot in history. The idea of Connor might be more important than the actual man himself to the movement.