When you’re talking about longstanding “traditions“, casual sexual harassment of and throwing himself onto women without consensual approval has to be included in there, right? Because that’s also part of his history. Have to keep that!
Also, pretty rich of you to complain about long-standing, traditionally white characters being recast as a different race, invoke terms like “ identity, politics” and “cultural continuity”, “forcing diversity” and call us “not serious people” when we have a very unserious man and clown in office signing executive orders and hell-bent on removing any trace of actual pieces of non-white and diverse history, taking away women’s voices and agency, ruining our economy and colluding with and trying to benefit the kinds of people that your so-called “cultural icon“, if he were to exist in real life, would absolutely be disgusted by and happily and readily take down if given the order.
But, you know, maintaining “aesthetic history” and “cultural identity”, right? Wouldn’t want to break the “immersion” and “confuse” or “alienate” anybody.
“Legacy”? Don’t make me laugh.