I bet they're thinking of changing The Flash ending to have Pattinson as the main Batman in the DCEU.
I doubt Pattinson would be willing to play ball on that, Reeves either.* I'd say that's why Affleck has made an unlikely comeback.
Honestly can see Joker 2 being the end of that thread, and Reeves/Pattinson being done. All trailing threads done by 2024.
*only exception to that would be if they handed the entire creative reigns to the new universe to Reeves which I can't see.
I wish someone had asked Zaslav about casting yesterday during the conference call.I doubt Pattinson would be willing to play ball on that, Reeves either.* I'd say that's why Affleck has made an unlikely comeback.
Honestly can see Joker 2 being the end of that thread, and Reeves/Pattinson being done. All trailing threads done by 2024.
*only exception to that would be if they handed the entire creative reigns to the new universe to Reeves which I can't see.
A cameo in Aquaman 2 isn't a comeback by any means.I doubt Pattinson would be willing to play ball on that, Reeves either.* I'd say that's why Affleck has made an unlikely comeback.
Honestly can see Joker 2 being the end of that thread, and Reeves/Pattinson being done. All trailing threads done by 2024.
*only exception to that would be if they handed the entire creative reigns to the new universe to Reeves which I can't see.
Merging Batman 86 into the DCEU was a bad idea
'89. It's an easy mistake to make though, as Keaton has just been 86'd.
Ezra's claims about the kkk and fbi honestly sounds like paranoid schizophrenia. My great aunt says similar things when she isn't medicated. She once thought a community college wanted to kill her for her land.
From what we know it's a stinger, as was Keaton's cameo before it was nixed. It inevitably suggests he'll make further appearances.A cameo in Aquaman 2 isn't a comeback by any means.
From what I understand, Keaton was supposed to have a cameo in Aquaman 2 because the film was originally coming after The Flash, and we know they wanted to have him as the future Batman of the DCEU after that film. Now that The Flash has been delayed and is coming after Aquaman 2 it would make no sense for him to appear out of the blue, hence why they put Affleck back in his place for that appearance. We already know he's in the beginning of The Flash so it would have to bode well with that.From what we know it's a stinger, as was Keaton's cameo before it was nixed. It inevitably suggests he'll make further appearances.
makes you wonder how important to the plot this Batman scene is to the movie that they would go back and re-shoot with Batfleck Vs just cutting the sceneFrom what I understand, Keaton was supposed to have a cameo in Aquaman 2 because the film was originally coming after The Flash, and we know they wanted to have him as the future Batman of the DCEU after that film. Now that The Flash has been delayed and is coming after Aquaman 2 it would make no sense for him to appear out of the blue, hence why they put Affleck back in his place for that appearance. We already know he's in the beginning of The Flash so it would have to bode well with that.
The question is what are they going to do with Batman at the end of that film moving forward. But the Affleck cameo means nothing more than that.
From what we know it's a stinger, as was Keaton's cameo before it was nixed. It inevitably suggests he'll make further appearances.
Then why not cut it completely?Except it doesn't. It is a replacement for a scene that wont make sense because of timing nothing more.
Probably to tease and build hype for The Flash. We'll know when the time comes.Then why not cut it completely?
Then why not cut it completely?
Saying Affleck's cameo means nothing is wishful thinking. He was supposed to be done and now he has an extra appearance. If they had wanted to they could have just went without any Batman cameo at all.


El Mayimbe said on Twitter spaces that Zaslav loves this movie.