I think when you make an asinine prediction that flies in the face of every professional projection as well as the general consensus, while citing truly irrelevant stats that are themselves non sequiturs , you should at minimum have at least one follow up post to address said prediction. It was a ridiculous baseless and easily and almost immediately refutable statement.
Oh and you made the prediction in this thread not the Godzilla thread so your complaint about being off topic is laughable . Oh and here's a tidbit from your original post:
" For Godzilla to open at $60 million would require a miracle or a dramatic and unexpected shift in the American zeitgeist when it comes to giant-monster films. "
A miracle? Really? And given that the projections were already in , as well as many other indicators, how can you say it was "unexpected"? By whom? You? But I thought you believed in miracles...
On topic: given whatever bizarre methodology you use to make your "predictions", the fact that your spidey2 prediction also looks way off base is no surprise. Under #600m was NEVER even a remote possibility. For very simple and obvious reasons (try using something called Google with search words "spider man" and "international box office").
1) You are clearly the sort of individual that is ostensibly intelligent, yet always leaves a clue that sufficient scrutiny will immediately reveal otherwise. For instance, you don't understand what a non sequitur is.
Referencing the domestic performance of other giant monster films, in a response to an other poster's statement about the performance expectations for Godzilla, is called contextually appropriate juxtaposition. Quoting my post about The Amazing Spider-Man 2, and making an unrelated, infant-grade tantrum about a separate Godzilla post I made, is a proper example of a non sequitur.
2) Your use of the word asinine, though likely unintentional, invokes the famed Princess Bride meme: “You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means." My prediction will likely be incorrect, but it was hardly without a reasonable foundation. I observed a trend with similar films and expected a similar performance based on that precedent.
3) I posted a Godzilla prediction in response to a person's argument that Godzilla would erode TASM2's box office take because Godzilla was going to have a huge open. I disagreed and made my reply. So...yeah...my post was on topic.
4) When did I ever say that Spider-Man would never cross $600 million? I said it wasn't likely to hit $640 million from domestic take for this weekend. I said my high end estimate is $650 million. And yes, my low end is $550, but I never said it would miss $600 million. Now you are just making up things to whine about lol.
5) Whilst engaged in your rather poor show of character and inablilty to appropriately disagree (i.e. in a mature manner), you seem to have missed the fact that Spider Fan engaged me about my Godzilla prediction, at which point, I revised my opinion and conceded that I will have to wait and see how the film peeforms. I even stated that I hope the film succeeds. I have no issues with giving audience to differing opinions. Unfortunately, your actions here suggest that you are the sad sort that believes that winning an Internet debate actually means something. As if you can win favor by "sticking it" to that one guy in the Spider-Man box office thread LOL.
As I said before, the conversation moved forward long ago, but you just had to prove your (unimportant) point. After all, it is unbearable to think that somewhere, someone on the Internet may be incorrect or disagree with you! How dare any person not agree with crowd consensus and analysts! How could any person expect civil discourse about a difference of opinion?! It's absurd! We must all rush forth to insult any person we disagree with, call them foolish and stupid, then in ironic fashion, make assertions and misuse collegiate words to such an effect that it reveals that we are the one that is foolish.
With that said, I suggest we cease derailing an entire thread. It is remarkably selfish.