The Amazing Spider-Man 2 The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 81

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]478929[/split]

 

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]478673[/split]

 

[OriginalMiles]

This shot is great. I don't recall it being in the film itself but it's great.

 

[Andrew Lucas]

After the break up.

 

[OriginalMiles]

Ah. Thanks Andrew.

 

[Andrew Lucas]

Ah. Thanks Andrew.

No problem mi amigo

 

[samsnee]

I will say the costume here was the best one yet.

 

[Andrew Lucas]

I will say the costume here was the best one yet.

Agreed

 

[SpideyK]

A long as f**k review, but pretty much hits the nail on the head:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X31Nkhmsm5M

To summarize, the guy explains that it's a CBM, not Citizen Kane (for instance), but does CBM pretty damn well.

 

[chaseter]

Who makes a one hour review and who watches a one hour review?

 

[LizardMan07]

There's one particular part that'll bother you greatly chaseter. Around the 29 minute mark I think

 

[Andrew Lucas]

Who makes a one hour review and who watches a one hour review?

Anyone who is interested on it,unlike you.

 

[Airnick]

A long as f**k review, but pretty much hits the nail on the head:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X31Nkhmsm5M

To summarize, the guy explains that it's a CBM, not Citizen Kane (for instance), but does CBM pretty damn well.

I haven't watched the full review yet, but so far I pretty much agree with him.

 

[LizardMan07]

Someone said something really interesting on reddit just before.

What if that movie andrew is supposed to be part of in 2015 is a cameo in the avengers? Wouldn't that be a plot twist?

 

[themaster]

Someone said something really interesting on reddit just before.

What if that movie andrew is supposed to be part of in 2015 is a cameo in the avengers? Wouldn't that be a plot twist?

Beyond the obvious rights issue that stands in the way of such a crossover, why on earth would Marvel want anything to do this incarnation of Spider-Man? The MCU is doing spectacularly well just as it is, and the Spider-Man brand, at least cinematically, is currently a floundering embarrassment.

 

[chaseter]

Anyone who is interested on it,unlike you.

Time for a hobby.

 

[LizardMan07]

Oh of course, it sounds absolutely impossible at first, but it kind of makes sense. Obviously it isn't real, but it isn't as impossible as it sounds.

Ok, we're entering tin foil hat mode here, but it would explain that tabloid report. Let's assume (strike one, can't assume but what the heck) that they're correct, and Andrew Garfield's spider-man is appearing in a film in 2015. Can it really be a stand alone spidey film? Seems like they're out of time for that, in fact, production for a movie releasing as a prime time blockbuster would probably have to start in around march? Which is when Avengers 2 started, can't think of any other film starting production around this time that would even have a chance of spider-man being in it. Now I could see Marvel wanting to keep a end-credits scene a secret, and it'd have to be something pretty big. Imagine a spider-man end credits sneak peak, you can't tell me that wouldn't catipult hype from the GA in absolute hysteria for the next film, and you can't tell me it wouldn't help boost spider-man 3's reception as well. Possibly grounds for a mutual agreement? With maybe Marvel getting some BO money off sony? The crossover makes sense, but would have had to have happened before TA2 started filming, an announcment of a crossover just before TASM2 might have killed interest, and ruined the suprise of this imagined End Credits in TA2. This is sounding more crazy and convuluted, but perhaps part of this was that Sony had to pay AG's wage to appear in MCU films in cameos and such, which all of a sudden makes Marvel's end of the deal sound sweeter, and explains why Andrew is rumoured to be in so many films in the space of six years. So basically, it's a secret plot twist to mutually benefit both film franchises by enhancing the MCU and making the spidey universe seem more appealing. A secret, behind-closed-doors deal that will blow all fans away after the credits roll in the Avengers 2.

Obviously so much wrong about that, but very fun to ponder

 

[Mr.?]

Beyond the obvious rights issue that stands in the way of such a crossover, why on earth would Marvel want anything to do this incarnation of Spider-Man? The MCU is doing spectacularly well just as it is, and the Spider-Man brand, at least cinematically, is currently a floundering embarrassment.

It's going to make over 700 million in the box office, since when is that considered floundering?

 

[spiderman2]

It's going to make over 700 million in the box office, since when is that considered floundering?

When spider man 1-3 made more then that even though those movies are 12-10-7 years old and didn't have 3d and the international market was smaller back then and Imax was not has big has today to. With the amont of tickets those movies sold if they did that today with inflation and with 3d the movie would be make around 1.4 billion and that dosnt even include that the international market has gotten a lot bigger then it was back then. When this movies are making less even with 3d and higher over all ticket price that is pathetic really. Spider man should be able to make avenger type money. Yet ever one is making less and less. Spider man is only saling around 50% has many tickets as it once did and in the usa it is even worse like 60% less that is a big big drop. If we see even like half that much more of a drop in a few years then sony is not going to beable to affored to even make these movies any more. It would be like a new batman coming out in 10 years and in 3d and making less. If batman movies are making around 800 million in 10 years and with 3d that would be bad. Another way to look at it would be if these movies didn't have 3d that 700-750 million would be more like 520-550 million and if you take inflation and put the movie back when spider man 1-3 came out these would only be like 450 million movies.

 

[Airnick]

[YT]ZRw6oDRohoA#[/YT]

So how would you guys feel about this...

 

[spiderman2]

[YT]ZRw6oDRohoA#[/YT]

So how would you guys feel about this...

So she is some YouTube girl?

 

[LizardMan07]

I'd prefer someone who's had a shred of acting experience. The girl has to outdo Emma Stone

 

[Airnick]

So she is some YouTube girl?

Yep.

 

[spiderman2]

Oh I will have to watch a few of her videos just to see what she is like interms of her personality.

 

[LizardMan07]

I really hope Sony don't hire that girl as MJ, just because she has red hair?