The Avengers The Avengers: News and Speculation - Part 27A sub-se - - - - - - Part 15

[ThePowerCosmic]

You sir.....I like the wya you think

And doesn't he have a small team as well? I think they also appear in EMH I forgot their names though.

Yes, he does! I forgot their names as well. Aren't they supposed to be warriors that he's taken from different points in time? More "aliens" to our time for The Avengers to face!

 

[Crimson King]

If it were the Kree, how come none of these mo-cap guys are wearing helmets or other armor? Seems like that would be easy to do practically.

I'm thinking they're more alien (or robotic).

 

[Chewy]

If it were the Kree, how come none of these mo-cap guys are wearing helmets or other armor? Seems like that would be easy to do practically.

I'm thinking they're more alien (or robotic).

I don't know, they might want to make it look more fluidly metallic/liquidy. Would definitely seem alien and look fantastic.

 

[ThePowerCosmic]

Maybe just maybe they are taking some aspects of the TV show (Or vice versa) Where the reason Stark isn't fighting is because he's trying to locate Kang's whereabouts? Also I actually quite liked the fact that Captain America still being alive caused some sort of time paradox. Sooooo many possibilities, then at the end they find out Hill is a skrull for a *dun dun dun* ending

That would be awesome. If Kang isn't in this movie(which I'm seriously thinking he will be), then he definitely needs to show up in a sequel.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

That looks just like one of Kang's Scarabs.

Indeed it does!

 

[The Infernal]

Would Kang being descended from both the Richards and Doom bloodline potentially rule him out for an Avengers movie? I mean wouldn't Fox buy up the rights to any characters related to Fantastic Four characters?

 

[MahvelBaby!]

If Kang is CGI would anybody be opposed to getting his EMH voice back? I think that guy could do amazing things with Whedon's writing. O_O

You know whats the best thing about this...if its not Kang I still may end up being happy with who it is!!!! I'm all for the Kree and or Skrulls/Thanos

 

[MahvelBaby!]

Maybe just maybe if the rumors to Marvel getting the F4 back are true.........it won't matter it all depends if Fox included him or not. Hell he has ties to Apocalypse from X-men too. You snooze you lose

 

[ThePowerCosmic]

Edit

 

[MahvelBaby!]

Kang is an Avengers villain, so I don't think that would be a problem. That's why I think they'll change his origin like they did with Whiplash in Iron Man 2.

Which I'm completely cool with if done right maybe they could leave it vague enough to include his real origin later on if MS ever gets F4 back.

 

[ThePowerCosmic]

If Kang is CGI would anybody be opposed to getting his EMH voice back? I think that guy could do amazing things with Whedon's writing. O_O

You know whats the best thing about this...if its not Kang I still may end up being happy with who it is!!!! I'm all for the Kree and or Skrulls/Thanos

I would prefer for the guy from EMH to voice him, his voice is perfect for Kang.

Would Kang being descended from both the Richards and Doom bloodline potentially rule him out for an Avengers movie? I mean wouldn't Fox buy up the rights to any characters related to Fantastic Four characters?

Kang is an Avengers villain, so I don't think that would be a problem. That's why I think they'll change his origin like they did with Whiplash in Iron Man 2.

 

[The Infernal]

I don't know, they might want to make it look more fluidly metallic/liquidy. Would definitely seem alien and look fantastic.

Maybe they're aiming for the live action version of this? That's if it is the Kree.

 

[ThePowerCosmic]

Indeed it does!

It really is a spitting image. From their wings to the "mandibles" that they both have at the front of them, they're very similar.

 

[Crimson King]

Maybe they're aiming for the live action version of this? That's if it is the Kree.

I would love that, but why CGI a helmet?

 

[The Infernal]

I would love that, but why CGI a helmet?

It would probably be easier considering mos of that body would be CGI if they went that way.

 

[Crimson King]

Maybe. To me, it seems like a whole lot more work when you could just put a helmet on a dude and call it a day.

 

[spideyboy_1111]

i think people are jumping to conclusions about this being a scarab... I think this is exactly what was described as "a chariot" look at the hilighted spots... from a technological standpoint, those would be where the feet go, to control the device.

if the "scarab" parts we see are the front (most logical if a scarab) the foot parts would be facing outwards to gain better control. but they're not, they're inwards... which indicates we are probably looking at the BACK of the "chariot" and that it crash landed face forward. (also makes far more sense for the way it landed). If it were a scarab... it would be flying it's "scarab" shape backwards... if you look at it from this perspective, you can see how it forms much more of a "chariot" shape, with it being Taller in the front (protecting the driver from on coming attacks), and shorter in the back.

 

[misjuevos]

i don't think they would use the starfield look for all the soldiers, that is captain marvels thing from having the bands. the others are just soldiers.

 

[C. Lee]

There's a chance that what we see is the undercarriage of the alien vehicle...it could have crashed upside down.

 

[marvel_freshman]

This will likely be one of mini-ships of the bigger spaceship that'll be added digitally hovering over the scene. I wonder if it'll be as big as the Helicarrier, or bigger.

 

[spideyboy_1111]

There's a chance that what we see is the undercarriage of the alien vehicle...it could have crashed upside down.

i suppose that's a chance too.. but for the fact the soldier is laying on it in a few pics probably depicts that it's not. Not to mention i'd expect some sort of repulsion tech, not a smooth, same colored, surface. I'm pretty confident these are the "chariots" described on AICN...

 

[HighFivingMF]

There's a chance that what we see is the undercarriage of the alien vehicle...it could have crashed upside down.

Yeah, it does look pretty upside-down.

 

[ThePowerCosmic]

This will likely be one of mini-ships of the bigger spaceship that'll be added digitally hovering over the scene. I wonder if it'll be as big as the Helicarrier, or bigger.

The Scarabs were also "mini-ships" that were fired from larger ships in EMH.

 

[ThePowerCosmic]

i suppose that's a chance too.. but for the fact the soldier is laying on it in a few pics probably depicts that it's not. Not to mention i'd expect some sort of repulsion tech, not a smooth, same colored, surface. I'm pretty confident these are the "chariots" described on AICN...

Anything could have happened with that soldier, though. He could have crawled out of the ship after it crashed upside down and died on that surface, for all we know. Also, any "tech" that the ship might have could be added via CG later on. Heck, there might not even be any type of repulsion tech at the bottom. We have no idea how these advanced ships work.

 

[spideyboy_1111]

Anything could have happened with that soldier, though. He could have crawled out of the ship after it crashed upside down and died on that surface, for all we know.

he didn't "crawl out of " anything... the ship is clearly barely larger than he is.. he couldn't fit "into" it at all..

I'd pretty much guaranteed is more of a "goblin glider" type "Chariot" that AICN clearly described. Using the term "Chariot" rather than "glider", "ship", or what not... is pretty specific.