The Avengers The Avengers: News and Speculation - Part 27A sub-se - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 32

Status
Not open for further replies.
Russia gets it because their Kremlin just got blew up in IMAX. Cut those drunkies some slack.
 
Couldn't it be just like another version of the current trailer for international purposes? Or is the first trailer already availible over there?
 
Suddenly the criticism of RIM now feels well deserved. So much for a trailer this weekend.

Maybe ASM will have a trailer.
 
Don't get it either. I really wonder if it will truly be a new trailer. Maybe just a recut of the one already out.

If it is new, I hope it hits YouTube.
 
TheDragonator said:
Suddenly the criticism of RIM now feels well deserved. So much for a trailer this weekend.

Maybe ASM will have a trailer.
Click to expand...

Deserved? Only if you're a bitter hater.

All I know is Russia is the land of the R5's ....someone better produce one for this trailer.
 
How long can Fox seriously develop crap with nothing to show for it?

Like when they "developed" Watchmen and never made a movie.
 
TheDragonator said:
Suddenly the criticism of RIM now feels well deserved. So much for a trailer this weekend.

Maybe ASM will have a trailer.
Click to expand...

There will be a trailer this weekend... in Russia. He wasn't wrong, we blew it out of proportion because we're desperate for a new trailer.
 
TheVileOne said:
How long can Fox seriously develop crap with nothing to show for it?

Like when they "developed" Watchmen and never made a movie.
Click to expand...

With Daredevil its gotta be more than 6 years as Elektra was that long ago (as she is part of the DD deal her film extended their hold on him as well). With the FF I've no idea. IMDB has it as being in development for a 2013 release (6 years after FF2), but I'd take anything on IMDB with a large pinch of salt.

Thing is if Fox wanted to play dirty they could rush out a cheap pile of crap (even more so than Elektra) and shove it in a few cheap theatres for a couple of weeks and can keep that rights that way (deal doesn't stipulate they have to make a good film for a lot of money with a mass release, that's just assumed the studio would want to do that).

Would be history repeating itself as that's more or less the same thing as when Roger Corman made his flick back in the 90's.
 
steintym said:
Don't get it either. I really wonder if it will truly be a new trailer. Maybe just a recut of the one already out.

If it is new, I hope it hits YouTube.
Click to expand...

Youtube? I suspect there will be certain sites receiving a Torrent of visitors from these boards come Christmas :cwink:
 
marcvader said:
I saw video of Rothman where he said they're developing a script for F4 just a coupl3 weeks ago. It was in that interview where he made that idiotic statement about FOX just now figuring out how important a good script is.
Click to expand...
studios can hire and make as many scripts as they want, doesn't mean the movie is happening though.

Also, if Fox don't have an F4 movie seriously in production, the rights will be very close to reverting to Marvel/Disney, since it's been 4 years since they used the brand.
Click to expand...
indeed, and im quite certain "production" means production, and not pre-pre production, which is all script writing is. True pre-production only really occurs once they greenlight the film, and higher the main cast.
 
wobbly said:
With Daredevil its gotta be more than 6 years as Elektra was that long ago (as she is part of the DD deal her film extended their hold on him as well). With the FF I've no idea. IMDB has it as being in development for a 2013 release (6 years after FF2), but I'd take anything on IMDB with a large pinch of salt.

Thing is if Fox wanted to play dirty they could rush out a cheap pile of crap (even more so than Elektra) and shove it in a few cheap theatres for a couple of weeks and can keep that rights that way (deal doesn't stipulate they have to make a good film for a lot of money with a mass release, that's just assumed the studio would want to do that).

Would be history repeating itself as that's more or less the same thing as when Roger Corman made his flick back in the 90's.
Click to expand...
actually... marvel does have a clause where they DO have to be happy with the film. It might not be "the best thing ever" but... if fox churned out a F4 movie that was absolutely nothing like the fantastic four, (sue being a prostitute, Thing being a racist, human torch raping women, and reed richard litterally "robbing the cradle" with sue... then yeah.. marvel could take them to court and get the rights back.
 
Wait a minute, if that's true, then why has Marvel not yet taken back X-Men, because I'm pretty sure I remembered seeing Rothman raping them for the third movie, in fact I'm pretty sure that entire move was plotted around Rothman and Ratner doing a whole thing of coke, "not the soda," and violating the X-Men in obscene and rude ways.
 
Fox keeps making X-Men movies. They haven't made jack crap out of Daredevil or Fantastic Four in years.
 
VictusMortuus said:
Wait a minute, if that's true, then why has Marvel not yet taken back X-Men, because I'm pretty sure I remembered seeing Rothman raping them for the third movie, in fact I'm pretty sure that entire move was plotted around Rothman and Ratner doing a whole thing of coke, "not the soda," and violating the X-Men in obscene and rude ways.
Click to expand...

Simple. FOX still has the rights. Marvel cannot simply just snatch those film rights back.
 
VictusMortuus said:
Wait a minute, if that's true, then why has Marvel not yet taken back X-Men, because I'm pretty sure I remembered seeing Rothman raping them for the third movie, in fact I'm pretty sure that entire move was plotted around Rothman and Ratner doing a whole thing of coke, "not the soda," and violating the X-Men in obscene and rude ways.
Click to expand...

because that's your personal taste.

so far, marvel (the company, not the current studio) as well as many of there high ranking heads have all had alot of say in the movies. Not complete say... but hell, even stan lee has been an executive producer for several of the films. Is the final product always what exactly they'd wish? probably not. but i don't think they're as picky.. or can be as picky. Or else they could say they disliked whatever they wanted. I think it has to be seriously valid
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

flickchick85
  • Sticky
Endgame Official Avengers: Endgame General Discussion Thread!
31 32 33
Replies
820
Views
93K
psylockolussus
psylockolussus
T
  • Locked
The Avengers The Avengers: News and Speculation - Part 27A sub-se - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 65
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
40K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
The Avengers The Avengers: News and Speculation - Part 27A sub-se - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 64
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
42K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
The Avengers The Avengers: News and Speculation - Part 27A sub-se - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 63
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
39K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
The Avengers The Avengers: News and Speculation - Part 27A sub-se - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 62
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
36K
Thread Manager
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Staff online

Members online

Total: 4,617 (members: 13, guests: 4,604)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,398
Messages
22,097,308
Members
45,893
Latest member
DooskiPack

Share this page

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"