i beg to differ, IMHO there is no comparison between big, properly calibrated screens, the different aspect ratios possible and a tv. Of course not everyone has the space, budget, etc. for really big screens, but look at the industry and it's evolution and there's a clear path towards bigger tv's and the reason is simple, the suspension of disbelief is far greater on the bigger screens. And then there's the soap opera effect, caused by a combination of the innability of LCD to switch at extreme high speeds and the fix, the 120-240hz processing. Most filmakers and industry professionals simply don't feel like it looks acceptable or faithfull. It essentially is making film look like the 6:00 pm soap opera or a video game. This is like buying a Piccasso and retouching some of the colors to make it look brighter and new. Filmmaking is an art form and movies should be watched so that they resemble the original as close as possible. Also, if we talk about 3d, there is simply no comparison to the bigger screens, no "cardboard effect". On the other hand, the intimacy of a home system is very hard to beat, but this may or may not be related to quality. I have a 63" Samsung and always turn off 120-240hz so that it looks more filmlike. I also have a Vidikron Vision 70 1080p Projector with Cinewide, (no black bars on scope),and a 115" 2.35:1 screen and i loooovvve movies. I would have honestly chosen scope for a movie this big. I just hope it works. Anyone think Thor and Hulk really clash, it seems odd there's no indication except for Ruffallo commenting on a kind of indirect way...?
t: LOL anyway....I find it rediculous that people are comparing the movie to the look of a tv movie, it looks nothing like it and will look nothing like it when they see it on the big screen. 
