Yeah, to be fair they made that shortly after the screen test and when filming had just started.It looks great but Pattinson's ears are too short.
Happy Batman Day !
I posted this theory of mine in the inspirations thread, but it covers a bit more than that. I think Silence of The Lambs is one of the films main inspirations, and it possibly POSSIBLY hints at a Joker cameo. Potential spoilers with solving of the first Riddler clue on the mayor's body.
Oh no it's absolutely speculation.Hey @BigBatTheory !
If I'm being honest with you here, while it's clear you've done some really impressive research and potentially found something of note with Mattson Tomlin's previous fuax-Batman script, I suspect you might be pushing a tad too far into the realm of speculation here.
Considering just how much time Matt Reeves spent working on the script for The Batman before Mattson's involvement was ever even announced, I highly doubt Reeves brought him into the mix so that they could lift and incorporate in a ton of the ideas from Mattson's previous script. It may well have been part of what got him the job of being Matt's co-writer, but between Reeves' repeated references to Chinatown in particular being a huge influence for his plans for The Batman and Mattson suddenly not being the co-writer credited in official credits from Warner Bros, I'm afraid I have to remain more skeptical than I'd like here.
You've done great work here though, even if I don't 100% buy all of this.
Is your friend on Reddit? I think he may have been who I spoke to that led me to the same conclusions a few weeks back.Oh no it's absolutely speculation.
I just think it's worth considering. Mattson wrote a pseudo-batman script with obvious SoTL influences, with themes that are absolutely a match for what Reeves' is doing with The Batman. And then Reeves makes a direct homage -essentially ripping an entire scene- from SoTL in The Batman. That and the fact that there is apparently going to be scenes at Arkham Asylum, and the rumors about Joker being seen only in an AA scene makes me think they will give us a Hannibal style Joker. It's all like, circumstantial evidence, but there sure is a LOT of it.
I'd imagine even if we saw a scene like this play out, they'd probably use a place hold (stand in) appose to having the role already cast... maybe only showing a joker-ish figure from behind or from the shadows (simply seeing a green haired individual reaching out a pale white hand, laughing would be more then enough to get the point across) without rushing to cast someone... this would give them more time/freedom to cast later onInteresting stuff. If there is a Joker cameo and they’re able to hide the casting (I imagine Reeves would want to hide it while WB would want him on the poster, actor top-billed) it would be MASSIVE once the film dropped...
I’m not expecting a Joker cameo, but even a 90s scene of Batman “getting info” from a locked up Joker ala Clarice/Lecter would fully engage people into a new take on the character as far as live action goes.
I mean, yeah. We do. It wouldn't really make sense for Rob to have encountered Joker off-screen considering his Rogues gallery is created in this movie. It would be much more impactful to have Batman's first encounter with the Joker be something we experience with him. It turns his world upside downWe’ve seen Nicholson meet BatKeats for the first time as a gangster. Batman is there when he falls into good ol Joker juice.
Ledger met BatBale fully formed.
Leto and Batfleck already had a history off screen. We never really see them share a frame but Batfleck is on top of Joker’s car in one scene, then rescues Harley moments later.
Phoenix as pre-Joker Arthur Fleck meets young Bruce Wayne at Wayne Manor, believing he’s his brother.
Do we HAVE to see Reeves’ Joker meeting Battinson for the first time? Not complaining if we do, but they can make their first run-in together an offscreen encounter. Maybe Joker was in his earliest stages at the time. Now when you see him in Arkham, it’s a year after the encounter, he’s fully formed but he’s one escape away from completing his look.
I could maybe see a traditional red hood origin hinted at or shown in part, because with that it's at least different than Ledger and Leto's take, presumably he'd be bullied/forced into this life rather than what happened in the case of '89 where he is the bully, and he could even make it similar to zero year with the revolving title and leave some ambiguity to it (just not as much as Ledger's).
I think the appearance of the red hood gang in generally would make for a cool sequel subplot that could set the joker up nicely for a third film (even though I want to see the Joker and Batman's relationship evolve over multiple films).