The Big Three: Denny O'Neil's work on them

Binker

Superhero
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
7,118
Reaction score
185
Points
73
Denny O'Neil. That name is one of the legends of comics. He made characters, largely from DC Comics, better than what people thought of them at that time. One fo his greatest success was Batman. He defined him and what he did is still around today. O'Neil not only did Batman, he also did Superman & Wonder Woman. He did the Big Three. Which leads to this thread.

What O'Neil did to the big three, he made them grounded and real.

Batman: he got him out of the batcave, out of wayne manor, the batmobile, and had him live at a penthouse, use his company as a "batcave", and had an undercover vechile to be the batmobile.

Superman: the storyline O'Neil wrote was The Sandman Saga, the whole point was to depower Superman to the Golden Age. Basically the way he was in 1938. Sadly, unlike Batman, once he reached the Golden Age level, DC Comics stopped it from continuing and have him go back to what he was before O'Neil's story (going to space, flight, etc. y'know normal).

Wonder Woman: known as the I Ching era, he had her lose all her powers and have her learn karate. Basically his Wonder Woman (if I may say that since he created the idea) was more realistic to the point where any woman could be her and not have to dream about god given powers. However, just like Superman, O'Neil's Wonder Woman didn't last as feminist leaders hated the changes and wanted her back as she was. "...took the only powerful woman and taken her power away from her" O'Neil, to this day, agrees with that.

His work on DC"s Big Three, lets call them "O'Neil's Big Three", looking back on this, what are your thoughts, good or bad, on his changes? Would you have liked Superman back in his Golden Age version, would you have liked the idea of Bruce living in his penthouse and the manor boarded up, would you have liked a Wonder Woman who could've been like the woman next to you? Etc. etc, etc.
 
O'Neil's Batman from the 70's is the quinessential Batman to me!
 
What about the other two?
 
1. I loved it. Not only was it good story telling, but I believe that it was the O'Neill Batman that inspired Frank Miller to seriously get into drawing and writing comics (at least, he interned under Neal Adams) I can honestly say (even though I wasn't alive at the time) that I believe that his version of Batman was the best it had been since the Bill Finger era, and among in-continuity stories, only Frank Miller's Batman Year One and the Alan Moore arcs are its equal.

2. Well, at least he got rid of all those verieties of rainbow kryptonite. As I once said in soc.history.what-if and rec.arts.comics.dc.universe, making Superman a T.V. news anchor wouldn't have made him more relevant, feeding him a juicy corporate or political scandal would have. (And if I had been Mr. O'Neill, I would have pinned [or better yet framed] on my cubical wall a copy of Action Comcis #13, with the famous "Superman and the Lemon" storyline.)

3. I disliked the O'Neill Wonder Woman the worst. Depowering her doesn't make her more relevant, making her confront bigotry and the women's issues of the day would have. (I would have loved to have put her up against the Klan-Even if it means turning off Grant Morrison permanantly to DC comics.)
 
O'Neil's run on Batman may be one of his most recognized and praised run's out of the big three. O'Neil's second best run may be his work on Green Lantern/Green Arrow.
 
His Batman was great, but his work on the other two was lacking. His Superman stuff was the precursor of today's weak Superman, a character that DC has pretty much ruined.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"