Yeah, it's all in good fun. Clearly we're all very interested in the BTS aspect of these movies so it is only logical that we spend a lot of time discussing them.
Was thinking about a potential timeline earlier. Assuming the strike stuff ends “soon” Part II stills releases in 2025 along with Penguin probably.
Would be a bad idea since it's the one film in his DCU slate with the most potential to make money; and he's already made his bed when announcing it in February and just clarifying it wouldn't release in "the same 6 month window" as The Batman Part ll.
This seems about right but I'd expect 2026 to be when Arkham releases since it was being written since last year and already has a showrunner and director.
I suspect if that complete ****ing rando is right it'll be purely by accident because everyone knows there's a reasonable chance it ain't gonna happen with Andy
.
I suspect if that complete ****ing rando is right it'll be purely by accident because everyone knows there's a reasonable chance it ain't gonna happen with Andy
Who won't last in this project especially if this is the writer they're talking to.
Okay, I don't think Muschietti winds up directing this either but lmao Logan writing it will have no effect on that.
If they can attract someone like John Logan to write the screenplay there is absolutely no incentive to keep Muschietti as they'd also be able to attract someone 100 times better with that type of screenwriter and with this IP.
They'd keep Muschietti is they want Muschietti. Which they clearly did. I suspect The Flash probably will lead to him dropping out but that is the only reason. Whether we think Muschietti sucks or not is totally irrelevant to whether Gunn and the studio does.
Muschietti is so obviously someone Gunn would like. The Flash is ****ing awful but I can immediately and easily imagine Gunn really liking it.
I still cannot believe you guys keep believing that whole "Flash was the best thing ever" line of PR that they made every executive at Warner Bros say. It should be more than obvious by now that no one that said it meant it.
Yes, because studio's and people involved are always completely rational and don't have their own opinions/biases/group think. Clearly, the more likely answer is that it was pure conspiracy and that Muschietti was a directorial false flag.
You keep saying it as if we hadn't seen this exact same thing happen in Hollywood several times lol. Remember Joss Whedon directing Batgirl which he later admitted was never actually a thing and he never even had so much of an idea for it? Remember the fake Jason Momoa Frosty the Snowman movie that was reported on after Ray Fisher's drama? It's hardly this extremely far-fetched conspiracy theory when it's something that WB specifically has done a lot of and it's clearly in their damage control playbook. (The Flash being a movie in which they had to do A LOT of damage control)
Why do I have to believe that to think Gunn likes Muschietti? It's not "Gunn believes he's the second coming or Gunn Hates him and can't wait to get rid of him "
