My attention span isn't my fault. That's a movie I can semi-understand the appeal of but not so much that it was worth my boredom, personally, for me.
So if you want to call me stupid on one level for this one movie alone I'll accept it. It wasn't one of those horrible movies enjoyed by truely stupid, vapid people who think really unoriginal elements of the movie are brand new and think liking it makes them smart like... eh, no need to get this thread off on a tangent. I'm confident in my taste and informedness about cinema and Constant Gardener just wasn't my thing.
Also, like you said you like Ralph Feinnes and that can really make a difference in how someone experiences a flick, particularly women, dunno if you are one. I'm indifferent about him personally, I do need to see more British cinema.
