• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

🇺🇸 The Convicted Felon in Chief: President Trump Thread

US News
How i missed his hate tweets (sarcasm), first he picked KC who he called a wonderful MAGA city, then hate tweets on Taylor Swift again, attacks Canada, again the US isnt losing $200 million, he is just full of crap, and virtually no Americans want Canada as 51st state, these reckless comments are designed to alienate us from he world and i can tell you Canadians hate us now, which took no time to do, again, randomly slaps 25% tariffs on steel and alum, no reason, just did,
I can hardly wait to see how much retirement money I'm going to lose. :(
 
Its part of the america first crap we have dealing with since before world war 2, insolationists, the burden of being a super power is that world looks to the United States to help stablize, we right or wrong have branded ourselves this moral beacon of freedom, and we have made mistakes like every imperial power has in the history of humanity, we just told everyone in the world we can solve problems, we care about people, true or not, thats how acted, President Biden reforged Nato to strengthen our alliances with Europe, Trump only cares about himself and what money he can make, its why i never beleived a businessman especially one who has failed as many times as he has should be a leader of everyone.
As an american, i read comments from Canadians who hate the United States and frankly, i do not blame them, we voted for this to happen, not enough of us took his threats seriously, not enough of us took project 2025 seriouly, even not i read comments on facebook saying that Elon is doing great things weeding out corruption in government all while attacking those who think he isnt doing that very thing, its amazing how easily people are fooled into giving power to people who didnt earn it.
 
I legit want California, Oregon, and Washing to secede into Canada lol, the Northeast too, so I can move the hell out of this cesspool of a country.
 

“Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that the line-item veto, as implemented in the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, violated the Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution because it impermissibly gave the President of the United States the power to unilaterally amend or repeal parts of statutes that had been duly passed by the United States Congress. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the six-justice majority that the line-item veto gave the President power over legislation unintended by the Constitution, and was therefore a violation of the separation of powers between the two branches.”

What Trump and Musk are doing is a far more illegal version of the line-item veto.
 


The Trump administration has chosen to create a constitutional crisis.
 


We're back to doing this full time again.
 
Trump says JD Vance should not be his successor for the same reason he is constantly talking about staying in power after 2028.


During the second part of the president's interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, the journalist asked, “Do you view Vice President JD Vance as your successor as the Republican nominee in 2028?”

“No, but he's very capable,” Trump replied.

While this could be interpreted as a snub to Vance, it could also underline Trump's apparent determination to stay on at the White House – despite being constitutionally prohibited from a third term.
 

“Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that the line-item veto, as implemented in the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, violated the Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution because it impermissibly gave the President of the United States the power to unilaterally amend or repeal parts of statutes that had been duly passed by the United States Congress. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the six-justice majority that the line-item veto gave the President power over legislation unintended by the Constitution, and was therefore a violation of the separation of powers between the two branches.”

What Trump and Musk are doing is a far more illegal version of the line-item veto.
Then action needs to be taken. Whatever is being done now isn't near good enough.
 


The Trump administration has chosen to create a constitutional crisis.

Is it a crisis if Republicans aren't even trying to stop it? :( It's more like "what Constitution?"
 


I do think this is the actual plan.



Is there anyone left he hasn't ticked off?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"