Drizzle
Harkissin'
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2007
- Messages
- 31,338
- Reaction score
- 27,653
- Points
- 118
"Yes...there are far too many studios," replied an anthropomorphized mouse from a dark corner of the room.
"Yes...there are far too many studios," replied an anthropomorphized mouse from a dark corner of the room.
"Yes...there are far too many studios," replied an anthropomorphized mouse from a dark corner of the room.
"Yes...there are far too many studios," replied an anthropomorphized mouse from a dark corner of the room.
"Yes...there are far too many studios," replied an anthropomorphized mouse from a dark corner of the room.
All hail Lord Feige."But Feige can make X-men movies now!!!"
Not much. But Bohemian Rhapsody and Greatest Showman did well at the boX office.All hail Lord Feige.
But seriously, how much did Fox actually still have going for it when Disney bought them outside of the X-Men franchise which was being carried by Deadpool by the end and the Avatar sequels which feel like they've been delayed for at least the past five years?
All hail Lord Feige.
But seriously, how much did Fox actually still have going for it when Disney bought them outside of the X-Men franchise which was being carried by Deadpool by the end and the Avatar sequels which feel like they've been delayed for at least the past five years?
Yeah but those aren't franchises, even if they are attempting to squeeze out a sequel to Bohemian Rhapsody.Not much. But Bohemian Rhapsody and Greatest Showman did well at the boX office.
I thought I remembered reading that they were going to continue that franchise picking up where War for the Planet of the Apes left off.Not gonna lie, I was silently waiting for a full on remake of Planet of the Apes with their series.
Hope Disney doesn’t keep that franchise on the shelf.
All hail Lord Feige.
But seriously, how much did Fox actually still have going for it when Disney bought them outside of the X-Men franchise which was being carried by Deadpool by the end and the Avatar sequels which feel like they've been delayed for at least the past five years?
That's strange. Because everyone else loved the idea.
Can't really blame him. Being that David Chase doesn't have any other major big screen/wide release film credits to his name, I'm sure he was excited for this and is disappointed that the release of this film will not be as he originally intended. Ironically, this was supposed to be an adaptation of an HBO show that graduated to the movies on the big screen, and now it will be winding up back on HBO anyway for everyone to watch at home.
When people think of "The Sopranos", the immediate thought would be "HBO/TV show". So how do you think most people will choose to watch it now?
I loved the Sopranos. Easily one of the best shows of all time.
But the fan base is not as big as it guarantees 100 Mio to watch it in cinemas.
Who, outside fans, will watch a movie about a series, that ended 15 years ago and who will watch it, without having seen this series.
How many cinema will show it in months crowded with other blockbusters?
Why did they make a Downton Abbey movie? I doubt that people watched, who haven’t seen the series
I mean...Why did they make a Downton Abbey movie? I doubt that people watched, who haven’t seen the series
'Downton Abbey' By The Numbers: Farewell To A Multimillion-Dollar DynastyIn 2013, the global audience was estimated at 120 million. The show has also been sold to over 220 territories, which is an incredible feat for British television.
Why Downton Abbey is a global success storyDownton Abbey is big business in China: 160 million people there tune in for the show.
And? When a **** ton of people watched your show, that's why you make the movie? The people who didn't watch the show are irrelevant.Your statistics doesn’t say something about how many people watched the series, before they paid tickets for the theatrical version
(btw that’s for the respectless gif)