Sawyer
17 and AFRAID of Sabrina Carpenter
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2004
- Messages
- 114,386
- Reaction score
- 27,858
- Points
- 203
Meh, Weaver is too old for Frost. I never liked that idea.
Seconded.
Meh, Weaver is too old for Frost. I never liked that idea.
so can we add deadpool to his ever growing list of crimes yet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_20th_Century_Fox_films#2000s
Well out of a decade... this isn't quite that good.
Weren't they also trying to not release Idiocracy or something like that? I'm pretty sure I remember a controversy along those lines.
Minority Report, XI, X2, uh.... help me out here, what else?
Looking at their filmography from past ten years (No use going beyond that. They were still a good studio in the 90's.), these are the movies I liked:
The X Files: I Want to Believe (2008) (F you, it was a good "two-parter episode")
Transporter 2 (2005)
Kingdom of Heaven (2005) (Director's Cut)
X2 (2003)
X-Men (2000)
Ravenous (1999)
In Death Sentence, Road to Perdition and Mouling Rouge! Fox is credited as "Presents", so I dunno what's the deal there. Either way, I liked those as well. Also, From Hell is a complete **** compared to the comic book, but I have soft spot for the movie adaptation as I saw it before reading the comic.
20th Century Fox produced films
(Fight Club was a Fox 2000 Pictures production. If someone wonders something...)
Fox Searchlight only distributed it. They didn't put up any money to actually make it. Same thing with Slumdog Millionaire.thank god that the wrestler was realesed before this.
can you imagine Rothman destroying this movie?
I've heard terrific things about it.I liked Idiocracy.
Idiocracy is probably the most relevant comedy in years because...it's actually happening.
Fox didn't make Taken...they bought the publishing rights for here in the states and chopped it down to get a PG-13. So Taken is not from Fox.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_20th_Century_Fox_films#2000s
Well out of a decade... this isn't quite that good.
Fox didn't make Taken...they bought the publishing rights for here in the states and chopped it down to get a PG-13. So Taken is not from Fox.
Definitely. Just like Die Hard 4... the unrated dvd was better.YeahBut they didn't make it so that is why it was a good movie. Heard the actual cut is better though.
Deadline Hollywood Daily reports that Rothman has actually been PROMOTED at Fox.
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/exclusive-fox-film-tv-shakeup/
No, no no no no! Aaaaaagh.
Sigh, I guess we'll always have a punching bag though, shaped like Tom Rothman.![]()
I give Fox a pass on Taken. From what I understand, most of the biggest cuts were made before it came stateside. A few trims later, Fox has a hugely marketable PG-13 thriller (that is still a fine film), so that time it worked.Fox didn't make Taken...they bought the publishing rights for here in the states and chopped it down to get a PG-13. So Taken is not from Fox.
The hell?!Deadline Hollywood Daily reports that Rothman has actually been PROMOTED at Fox.
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/exclusive-fox-film-tv-shakeup/

It's really funny and Terry Crewes is awesome in it.Fox Searchlight only distributed it. They didn't put up any money to actually make it. Same thing with Slumdog Millionaire.
I've heard terrific things about it.
Not to disagree with you but how did it make it better? All they added in was pointless swearing{yes, I know it's a DH movie} that did nothing to enhance the overall movie.Definitely. Just like Die Hard 4... the unrated dvd was better.