Kane52630
[BAT NIPPLES INTENSIFIES]
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2009
- Messages
- 124,503
- Reaction score
- 64,345
- Points
- 218
Theo James - Lex.
A young, entrepreneur, Musk-type. Lex Luthor makes science and robotics "sexy".
Theo James - Lex.
A young, entrepreneur, Musk-type. Lex Luthor makes science and robotics "sexy".
Theo looks like someone that would be considered for Supes. I feel they should have a very different look from one another.
I’m sorry, I have to put my foot down on Musk-inspiration. It’s gonna be one of my few vetoes.
With so many innovators in history to draw inspiration from, you’d have to zero in on something specific to point to and say “There’s Lex.”What do you think it means when people use the idea of Musk as an inspiration? What do you envision?
With so many innovators in history to draw inspiration from, you’d have to zero in on something specific to point to and say “There’s Lex.”
At this point, his persona is overshadowing whatever tech accomplishments he’s made, and unfortunately, his persona is dog****.
Rich businessman Lex Luthor has been in the comics for over 30 years so I think there is enough source material to draw from. Why do we need to use Elon Musk as a major influence just because he's the current rich ******* that people are mad at? Wouldn't that if anything date the movie horribly in 20 years? I mean Snyder gave us Jesse Eisenberg as Lex which felt like he was trying to make him a Mark Zuckerberg type, and it ages even worse now, which shows the pitfalls of trying too hard to be contemporary. Just stick to the comics. Look at what has stuck around for 30 years and try to stay true to that.
But that's not true. Luthor has not stayed the same for 30 years. Like every other character in fiction, he's changed, and evolved with the times. He's been an allegory for a lot of different people, yes, including Trump. There's numerous interpretations of Lex, he's never just been a generic business archetype.Rich businessman Lex Luthor has been in the comics for over 30 years so I think there is enough source material to draw from. Why do we need to use Elon Musk as a major influence just because he's the current rich ******* that people are mad at? Wouldn't that if anything date the movie horribly in 20 years? I mean Snyder gave us Jesse Eisenberg as Lex which felt like he was trying to make him a Mark Zuckerberg type, and it ages even worse now, which shows the pitfalls of trying too hard to be contemporary. Just stick to the comics. Look at what has stuck around for 30 years and try to stay true to that.
But that's exactly true either. Luthor, like every other character in fiction, has changed, and evolved with the times. Luthor has an allegory for a lot of different figures, yes, including Trump. He's never just been some generic business archetype.
And quite simply put, that's not interesting. A Superman movie set in 2025 that doesn't have anything to say about the contemporary culture it exists in, is not interesting. You say it makes the movie dated, I say the movie weightless, and irrelevant.
The absence of contemporary cultural markers, does not make a movie "timeless". Contrary to popular belief, all movies are a product of their time. Citizen Kane is a product of it's time. But it's ideas, it's *themes*, are timeless, universal. That's what we hone in on when we watch such classics, not the absence of Smartphones.
So why does he need to be based on one single one? Isn't Lex supposed to represent ALL evil billionaires?
Making Lex Luthor an Elon Musk type or a Donald Trump type is not interesting. If you write Lex Luthor well, the audience would be able to see whatever they hate about current billionaires in him because that version of the character has lasted in the comics for over 30 years. That is why Clancy Brown's version in Superman The Animated Series continues to work, while Eisenberg's take does not.
Should the real world be reflected in these movies? Absolutely. But I am leery on a version of Lex Luthor that is too much a "insert current hated rich ******* here" analog. That just feels like it dates the movie before the movie has even come out. I would like this Superman movie to hold up in 10, 20 years, the way I feel movies like The Dark Knight have and will continue to do.
I'm glad someone else gets it. I can't tell if people have muted me because nothing I say seems to be heard.You can use Musk for Lex the same exact way that they used him for Iron Man, or the same exact way that Kurt Cobain and Howard Hughes were used for Bruce Wayne. It doesn't have to be literal, just aspects of him are fine. Succession is a show that uses a ****ton from real life people and powerful figures yet none of their characters are actually 100% like said people.
I really don't think there's any contemporary billionaire that Lex should be based on. We live in an age of profoundly boring and just plain dumb rich dudes. If we really want a real-world inspiration, the closest modern analogue in terms of personality would be Steve Jobs, IMO. If I were Gunn, I'd have my Lex actor look at Fassbender's Jobs and Leo's Hughes for inspiration.I'm glad someone else gets it. I can't tell if people have muted me because nothing I say seems to be heard.
But it's not basing it on them, this is my entire point. Yes include Steve Jobs in the mix but just like the others don't make Lex a bald Steve Jobs, you just use elements of these real life historical figures.I really don't think there's any contemporary billionaire that Lex should be based on. We live in an age of profoundly boring and just plain dumb rich dudes. If we really want a real-world inspiration, the closest modern analogue in terms of personality would be Steve Jobs, IMO. If I were Gunn, I'd have my Lex actor look at Fassbender's Jobs and Leo's Hughes for inspiration.
Not exactly. Luthor has never just been a generic rich guy.So why does he need to be based on one single one? Isn't Lex supposed to represent ALL evil billionaires?
Eisenberg's take on Lex didn't fail because they tried to modernize the character, it failed because Eisenberg gave a terrible performance, and he wasn't written well in the script.Making Lex Luthor an Elon Musk type or a Donald Trump type is not interesting. If you write Lex Luthor well, the audience would be able to see whatever they hate about current billionaires in him because that version of the character has lasted in the comics for over 30 years. That is why Clancy Brown's version in Superman The Animated Series continues to work, while Eisenberg's take does not.
So did you say the same thing about Reeves basing his Bruce Wayne off of Kurt Cobain, or Bella Real off of AOC? Or James Mangold making mutants a metaphor for the Border Crisis/Immigrant children in 'Logan'? Really, ALL of the X-Men movies.Should the real world be reflected in these movies? Absolutely. But I am leery on a version of Lex Luthor that is too much a "insert current hated rich ******* here" analog. That just feels like it dates the movie before the movie has even come out. I would like this Superman movie to hold up in 10, 20 years, the way I feel movies like The Dark Knight have and will continue to do.
I think it's just people having a knee-jerk reaction to the mere mention of Musk's name, because of what he's become. But people are forgetting how he STARTED, and how well-liked he was a decade or so ago.I'm glad someone else gets it. I can't tell if people have muted me because nothing I say seems to be heard.
I'll go with the bottom two.SUPERMAN
Spencer House
![]()
or
Connor Swindells
![]()
LOIS LANE
Jessica Henwick
![]()
LEX LUTHOR
Glenn Howerton
![]()