The Great Galactus Debate!

The Geek Vault

Come at me bro
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
5,696
Reaction score
0
Points
31
So a friend and I got into a big debate about Galactus and I want to know what you all think. So do you believe Galactus is a nececcity in the universe in Marvel? Many times it's been stated that Galactus will eventually be doing more harm than good, so what do you guys think? Also one thing I was thinking about is why in Marvel have they never had a bunch of people worshipping Galactus. I mean there are a lot of anti mutant worshippers in the MU, why not have a huge group with a "Church of Galactus" who believe Galactus needs to come and purge the world of Evil?
 
One of his current heralds worships him.

And it's supposedly been retconned that Galactus has to feed in order to keep some other worldly being at bay or some crap. I think it starts with an A.
 
It's always been stated that Galactus was a force of nature; therefore, he is necessary in the Marvel Universe.

But I haven't read the FF in a few years, so that might have changed...

:huh: :huh: :huh:

:csad:
 
I've read that basically he's consuming energy by destroying planets and storing it so that when the universe ends, he can recreate the next one by expending all that energy in a new Big Bang. In effect, he'd become the next Eternity.

Makes sense to me.
 
One of his current heralds worships him.

And it's supposedly been retconned that Galactus has to feed in order to keep some other worldly being at bay or some crap. I think it starts with an A.

Yeah, Abraxas. Galactus got killed, and then Abraxas came and start raising all kinds of hell. Franklin Richards used his powers to reintegrate Galactus who actually became a star or something when he died. Then Galactus defeated Abraxas. It's been awhile since I read it, but I think thats the gist of it.
 
I had an idea for a sprawling Marvel epic, where a coalition of alien races would arrive on earth to recruit the FF and other heroes to go to war against Galactus, to end his reign of destruction once and for all. The whole debate about Galactus's place in the universe, and how someone or something would have to fill that void when Galactus is gone, would come into play at some point. I think it would be a good story.
 
I kind think of it this way. There is a balance in the u between the big cosmic entities, Eternity, Infinity, Order etc with Death, Oblivion, Chaos etc.

No one is allowed too much power, somewhere Galactus fits in. -- Maybe in the middle.

He eats worlds which would tip the scales to the bad side but he also helps out (like in Infinity Gauntlet and Annihilation + he creates heralds who are usually good) which tips the scales to the good side.
 
There was a FF story during Bryne's run on the book. Galactus came to Earth severely weakened to feast on it, and it took the combined might of the Four, the Avengers, and Dr. Strange to bring him down (while Daredevil and Spider-Man, feeling out of their league, sat and watched on a roof). Only due to being staving, did Galactus fall. However, rather than allow Galactus to pass, Reed Richards felt that all life is worth saving, even Galactus', so he works to dom so. And not one hero there seemed too upset about that.

But if you think about it, it makes little sense. Superheroes often destroy vampires, and feel little remourse about doing so, because their very existence means they have to kill others. They MUST kill innocent people so they can continue living. Most superheroes feel that is wrong. There are a few vampires that feast on "guilty" people like Morbius (who isn't even a mystical vampire, but a science-based "living vampire"), but most vampires just bite whoever they can land. Galactus is essentially a GIANT vampire. Dr. Strange literally crippled the guy by unleashing all the spirits of the dead from his devoured worlds on him. You'd think Spider-Man, whose entire life has been shattered by merely losing one or two people in his life, would object to allowing that to continue on a cosmic scale.

Later on, Reed was put on space trial for that act and it was later that Watcher or someone else basically went on about how "Galactus is a force of nature" and thus has a place in the cosmos, which always struck me as ridiculously liberal, as in the notion that the "act of murder", no matter who does it or the circumstances, is never justified. That killing Galactus to spare trillions is somehow no better than his act of killing them.

I mean, superheroes kill Dracula when given half the chance, but Galactus is determined to have a place in society? If some think tank said Vampires had a right to cull the herd of humanity, perhaps citing overpopulation and scarce resources, would most heroes agree? To me it almost look like Reed has a bit of an Earthling prejudice; he'll eagerly make deals with Galactus to spare Earth, but so long as he is menacing some other poor planet away from his notice, that's fine. And you'd think Mr. Fantastic would be the last hero to feel that way, having dealt with aliens for half his career.

But that's all old hat now. Galactus is a big character and thus can't die. I suppose it could make sense for there to be a "Church of Galactus" somewhere like there is a Church of Hala for Capt. Marvel. There are always nihilists out there.
 
Dread said:
However, rather than allow Galactus to pass, Reed Richards felt that all life is worth saving, even Galactus', so he works to do so. And not one hero there seemed too upset about that.

Someone should dig out Zev's old rants on that subject, he had some pretty good ones.
 
Isn't there some deal where if Galactus actually dies, it will lead to the unravelling of the universe? I feel as if I've heard that somewhere.
 
Isn't there some deal where if Galactus actually dies, it will lead to the unravelling of the universe? I feel as if I've heard that somewhere.

Like I said, Bryne (I think) or someone else established that Galactus should be safe from revenge squads because it is part of the universe's order that planets get eaten, and naturally subsequent writers have reinforced it.
 
Yeah it's basically just nature. One can really debate the whole morale issue vs. nature vs. survival of the fittest and so on.
 
I've read that basically he's consuming energy by destroying planets and storing it so that when the universe ends, he can recreate the next one by expending all that energy in a new Big Bang. In effect, he'd become the next Eternity.

Makes sense to me.

I've never read that before. But he sounds better suited for the task than the Phoenix Force.
 
Isn't there some deal where if Galactus actually dies, it will lead to the unravelling of the universe? I feel as if I've heard that somewhere.

If he ever died before the universe dies, then it should be written that somebody else will take his place. I don't mean one of his heralds, but somebody else.
 
If he ever died before the universe dies, then it should be written that somebody else will take his place. I don't mean one of his heralds, but somebody else.

Well he did die, they talked about that earlier above.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"