The Hole...NOT HOLES...but THE hole!

Catman

Avenger
Joined
Jul 14, 2002
Messages
29,046
Reaction score
1
Points
31
Has anyone seen this movie? I just finished watching it on television. It stars Thora Birch and (a younger) Keira Knightly. The movie was interesting. It was nothing special.

Well, anyway, I went to IMDb afterwards to learn some BTS stuff on the film. And, I think the production of this film is much more interesting.

Keira Knightly was 15 when she filmed this movie. And, she has two nude scenes. She also has a scene with a naked man. Yes, he was ACTUALLY naked since he shows his ding-dong in the movie and in one wide shot both Keira and the naked dude are in the frame. And, finally a sex scene. Crazy huh?
 
It sucked, and not even the brief flash of Knightly's better half was enough to make it worthwhile, even for a perv like me.
 
Catman said:
Has anyone seen this movie? I just finished watching it on television. It stars Thora Birch and (a younger) Keira Knightly. The movie was interesting. It was nothing special.

Well, anyway, I went to IMDb afterwards to learn some BTS stuff on the film. And, I think the production of this film is much more interesting.

Keira Knightly was 15 when she filmed this movie. And, she has two nude scenes. She also has a scene with a naked man. Yes, he was ACTUALLY naked since he shows his ding-dong in the movie and in one wide shot both Keira and the naked dude are in the frame. And, finally a sex scene. Crazy huh?

It does not stand up to repeat viewing but the first time I watched it I really enjoyed it ... very tense.

Made me think how I would react to being trapped without hope of rescue.

I was not aware of Keira being that young during filming ... if its true is that not illegal?
 
It wasn't an american made film, so that wasn't an issue.
 
I've seen it and like this film. I like it even more because its British!
 
Rez said:
It wasn't an american made film, so that wasn't an issue.

Exactly.

It sucked, and not even the brief flash of Knightly's better half was enough to make it worthwhile, even for a perv like me.

I'm not gonna say it sucked. It was a bad movie...sure! But, it was kinda interesting.
 
It kept me intrigued. I was entertained, ut the ending was stupid IMO and I thought it was a great concept but it could have benefited from better execution.

And I knew Knightley was young in it....BUT THAT YOUNG?! Wow. To be fair she has always looked older (I thought she was more than 18 in Pirates 1 for example).

Her acting has come QUITE the long way though between that movie and Pride & Prejudice. I think, anyway.
 
DACrowe said:
It kept me intrigued. I was entertained, ut the ending was stupid IMO and I thought it was a great concept but it could have benefited from better execution.

Agreed. :yay:
 
Kevin Roegele said:
What's the point Keira flashing her chest?

Honestly, I don't care. But its weird that they would cast a 15 year old to flash her breasts. Especially since they had the big boobs of Thora Birch to put into good use. :)
 
Rez said:
It wasn't an american made film, so that wasn't an issue.

Sorry ... still confused.

Even in the UK surely nudity from a 15 year old is illegal?
 
Where's Kevin Roegle when you need him?
 
livrule said:
Sorry ... still confused.

Even in the UK surely nudity from a 15 year old is illegal?

What exactly are you confused about. I just said it wasn't an issue. Sorry that the rest of the world doesn't fit into your American way of thinking.
 
Rez said:
What exactly are you confused about. I just said it wasn't an issue. Sorry that the rest of the world doesn't fit into your American way of thinking.

LOL ... well ... As I'm from Plymouth Devon .... which is in the UK I think its a valid question.

Rather than just giving me "It wasn't an issue" ... tell me WHY its not an issue to have an under age girl naked in a movie?

By the way what is the "American way of thinking"??
 
Kevin Roegele said:
What's the point Keira flashing her chest?


The director liked to see them :ninja:
 
its just boobs and nudity. big deal.

death and violence is worth then the human body/sexuality.
 
livrule said:
Sorry ... still confused.

Even in the UK surely nudity from a 15 year old is illegal?

You might imagine so, but it's not. Nudity is not illegal in a motion picture at any age. I also find it dubious that a 15-year old is used for (literally) titilation, but it passed the censors.

If anything should be illegal though, it's Calendar Girls. I thought that was a horror movie when I heard about it.
 
Kevin Roegele said:
You might imagine so, but it's not. Nudity is not illegal in a motion picture at any age.

So, you got a lot of pedos in the UK? ;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"