Invader Joker
Superhero
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2012
- Messages
- 9,926
- Reaction score
- 7,967
- Points
- 103
Even if they don't do a direct sequel, I hope Reeves can convince Phoenix to do a JK Simmons and play a Joker that's not Arthur Fleck.
This is the most realistic scenario I see playing outEven if they don't do a direct sequel, I hope Reeves can convince Phoenix to do a JK Simmons and play a Joker that's not Arthur Fleck.
Joaquin’s Arthur and Joker aren’t even the same person anymore, so it’s not even really a point of contention.Even if they don't do a direct sequel, I hope Reeves can convince Phoenix to do a JK Simmons and play a Joker that's not Arthur Fleck.
Neither do I, hence why I think a different version of the Joker with phoenix starring in reeves batman is one of the few ways to get him to return.I dont think Arthur Fleck is a real person anyway.
I won't hate if the former two beat it, but if it can still maintain that spot this weekend after Gemini Man, Addams Family and Jexi, you know it has legs.
I dont think Arthur Fleck is a real person anyway.
I'm more than convinced this is Joker breaking the fourth wall and poking fun at Ben Affleck.
Poor little Robert![]()
Got this of BOF...pretty weird. The second review is from a web site that grades films on how PC they are...
It makes me wonder more what kind of vetting they're doing. Grading films on how PC they are? WtfYeah that kinda shows how imbalanced that whole system on RT is.
It makes me wonder more what kind of vetting they're doing. Grading films on how PC they are? Wtf
This should be reported! critics can issue 2 review scores?! This is F#@%ed up and I bet if this was even corrected they would use the bad score on purpose!![]()
Got this of BOF...pretty weird. The second review is from a web site that grades films on how PC they are...
that kind of shows that both sides of the political spectrum are potentially doing this. grade whether it checks out on a PC checklist or grades whether it's too PC. But I can admit that maybe the left is more notrious in this area. The reality is Rotten Tomatoes is the worse. Prior to its existance nobody gave a damn what critics thought of movies. And if they did they would have just a couple of go-to critics they would listen to (like Siskel and Ebert) and be done with it. In fact, I think the general consensus was that critics kind of suck. Rotten tomatoes kind of forced the world to consider what every established critic thinks and that was never a thing until now!I read one or two reviews from The Mary Sue a number of years back. Never again. They would rather see if a movie hits all the marks on their PC checklist instead of actually reviewing the movie like a real critic.

I totally respect that some people want this to stay totally stand alone and don't want Phoenix's Joker to intersect with Batman in any way.
But...remember how heartbreaking it was when Heath's Joker said, "I think you and I are destined to do this forever..." and the crushing reality set in that we'd never see him again in the role?
It feels kind of crazy to me that here we are 11 years later and now we have a new Joker portrayed by a world class actor that is getting a similar sort of Oscar hype response...and the opportunity to see him return and face off with Batman is right there. And half of us are like, "Meh no thanks". LOL, again I respect everyone's opinion and I get both sides of it, but it's undeniable that from a marketing standpoint it seems like such a great built-in hype angle for whenever Joker pops up in Reeves' universe. I'm already there in terms of viewing the entire Joker film as one of his multiple choice stories, so continuity is a non-factor.