I love the character but I still think it would be funny if Reeves just decided never to do the Joker.
Considering what a money-maker he is, I doubt that’s what happens, but still. Give some other rogues the spotlight.
I dont get what's the issue here. We still getting our 3rd cinematic Batman in same span. So what's the difference? You are all for new Batman but not for new Joker? I dont get it... There is also high chance that we aint gonna see Joker in this trilogy at all. Batman has big rogue gallery of villains. And personally I wish to see new ones on screen instead reusing old ones unless there is something interesting to with reimagining those characters.Honestly, my biggest hang-up would be that this would be our third cinematic Joker in a fairly short span of time (though, to be fair, it probably wouldn’t be that different from getting Ledger-Leto-Phoenix in just over a decade). Just strikes me as too much.
My solution, and one that would undoubtedly make cash rain from the Heavens, is Pattinson vs. Phoenix. Portray the events of the Joker film as one of his multiple choice pasts but carry over some of those Fleck quirks and let the two actors bounce off one another.
But Phoenix almost certainly doesn’t go for that, so...
Plus the new Joker's we've got on film have barely had any real screen time.I dont get what's the issue here. We still getting our 3rd cinematic Batman in same span. So what's the difference? You are all for new Batman but not for new Joker? I dont get it...
Plus the new Joker's we've got on film have barely had any real screen time.
Leto has less than 10 minutes between SS and ZSJL.
Phoenix isn't actually Joker until the last 20 minutes of his movie.
The Gotham tv show has a better argument for having shown a lot of their version of the Joker, but he's on the small screen so it doesn't reach as many audiences.
So on the big stage where it really counts, it's not much at all. By the time we do get a new movie Joker, there would have been plenty of downtime for us to get excited again.
I mean, some other rogues definitely deserve a spotlight for a change, but I think it'd be very unwise to exclude Joker from the trilogy, or any Batman trilogy/series/etc. for that matter. The fact remains that he is the #1, most iconic, most personal, biggest archenemy of Batman. That's not going to change, ever. So not including him is taking away from a BIG part of the mythos, perhaps one of the biggest. So I'm not really in the "tired of Joker" camp, dude is here to stay and those who dislike it will just have to deal with it lolI dont get what's the issue here. We still getting our 3rd cinematic Batman in same span. So what's the difference? You are all for new Batman but not for new Joker? I dont get it... There is also high chance that we aint gonna see Joker in this trilogy at all. Batman has big rogue gallery of villains. And personally I wish to see new ones on screen instead reusing old ones unless there is something interesting to with reimagining those characters.
I grew up watching B:TAS and I never really was that much of let say tied up to having Joker being ultimate Batman's main archenemy. Batman has plenty of villains and plenty of stories which are miles better than just another story with another Joker. That's all I am saying. I am not saying to exclude him but if you gonna do another Joker there needs to be more purpose than making it just another adaptation.I mean, some other rogues definitely deserve a spotlight for a change, but I think it'd be very unwise to exclude Joker from the trilogy, or any Batman trilogy/series/etc. for that matter. The fact remains that he is the #1, most iconic, most personal, biggest archenemy of Batman. That's not going to change, ever. So not including him is taking away from a BIG part of the mythos, perhaps one of the biggest. So I'm not really in the "tired of Joker" camp, dude is here to stay and those who dislike it will just have to deal with it lol
I saw a few people losing it over this look, but all I could think of was how often something like this has been RuPaul’s out-of-drag wardrobe on Drag Race.
At least it wasn’t a blue latex luchador mask and a purple hoodie!I saw a few people losing it over this look, but all I could think of was how often something like this has been RuPaul’s out-of-drag wardrobe on Drag Race.