Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]536777[/split]
I honestly think it was a mistake to make Batman a lighter character in JL. Or at least they should have balanced it out with more angsty, cynical moments. He just lacked the epic-ness he had in BVS which made basically every Batfleck hater eat their words. His lines in BVS are so epic and quotable. "You were never a god. You were never even a man" "you're not brave. Men are brave" "I'm older now than my father ever was" "Tell me, do you bleed? You will" "They taught me the world only makes sense if you force it to"
I honestly think it was a mistake to make Batman a lighter character in JL. Or at least they should have balanced it out with more angsty, cynical moments. He just lacked the epic-ness he had in BVS which made basically every Batfleck hater eat their words. His lines in BVS are so epic and quotable. "You were never a god. You were never even a man" "you're not brave. Men are brave" "I'm older now than my father ever was" "Tell me, do you bleed? You will" "They taught me the world only makes sense if you force it to"
So much good stuff. I can't think of a single truly epic Batman line in JL. All that comes to mind is his pep talk to Barry and maybe when he talks about the stranger that comes on the king tide.
Other than the bleed line, none of those lines even approach being quotable. And they're never quoted.
The only line that has been quotable....
![]()
![]()
First, quite a few of those lines are from the comics. They were already memorable.
Secondly, those are the lines of a creature of ego. They are more intense and assertive, so they tend to be more memorable. He has been humbled after what happened in BVS. He's more compassionate. His lines in JUSTICE LEAGUE reflect that.
I think there are some pretty darn good lines in the movie, and the characterization is light years "better" from the standpoint of being faithful.
I can't speak for all the others....I loved WW, but JL looked and sounded like a mess. I didn't like the look of the Flash and thought Cyborg looked laughable. Scenes from the movie all looked like an extension of the Snyderverse...which I didn't like. So I took a pass on it.But why did everyone who loved WW not turn out for JL? Why didnt the audience care about seeing her again? Why did they not care about seeing this Aquaman, Flash, Cyborg? Literally - why did nobody care about the Justice League?
Scenes from the movie all looked like an extension of the Snyderverse...which I didn't like. So I took a pass on it.
I can't speak for all the others....I loved WW, but JL looked and sounded like a mess. I didn't like the look of the Flash and thought Cyborg looked laughable. Scenes from the movie all looked like an extension of the Snyderverse...which I didn't like. So I took a pass on it.
I do think people are overcomplicating things when it comes to JUSTICE LEAGUEs' box office.
Many people who saw BVS were either bored by it or turned off by the character depictions. It became a meme on social media, and it became "cool" to hate the franchise. The media ran with that narrative, and here we are. JUSTICE LEAGUE seems to have better legs than BVS, and seems to be getting better audience responses, but that just wasn't enough after BVS.
They have to find a way to improve the narrative surrounding this franchise.
That's pretty much the long and short of it. People keep trying to perform logistical gymnastics to deny it, but end of the day, a lot of people who didn't like the last movie ended up staying away.
The DCEU as a brand, has been damaged.
They put themselves into a "damned if they do, damned if they don't" situation.
There's no indication that any movie in the DCEU would fare better than JL, apart maybe from WW2 and maybe the Batman movie (just because it's Batman).
But if they do reboot, what exactly do they say about it? It's a PR nightmare. They'd either have to admit to screwing it up the first time, or admit that they're cutting their losses and betting on something new--which probably wouldn't have much faith put in it because of how they screwed the pooch the first time.
Part of me feels bad, because I want to see good DC movies, but part of me laughs because they brought this on themselves.
I'm not usually a fan of Campea, but he laid out the problems with a reboot. The DCEU has been seeing diminishing returns, so there's no guarantee right now launching a new universe is gonna do anything to combat the franchise's PR problem.
Part of the reason Batman Begins was so successful was the fact that it came out a full 8 years after the failure of Batman and Robin, meaning there was time for the stink to wear off. And even with Spider-Man Homecoming, Marvel at least had the option of introducing their rebooted Spider-Man in a hit crossover that was well regarded by critics and audiences.
Is there a way to pull off something similar with DC's characters? I'm not sure.
I'm not usually a fan of Campea, but he laid out the problems with a reboot. The DCEU has been seeing diminishing returns, so there's no guarantee right now launching a new universe is gonna do anything to combat the franchise's PR problem.
Part of the reason Batman Begins was so successful was the fact that it came out a full 8 years after the failure of Batman and Robin, meaning there was time for the stink to wear off. And even with Spider-Man Homecoming, Marvel at least had the option of introducing their rebooted Spider-Man in a hit crossover that was well regarded by critics and audiences.
Is there a way to pull off something similar with DC's characters? I'm not sure.
They put themselves into a "damned if they do, damned if they don't" situation.
There's no indication that any movie in the DCEU would fare better than JL, apart maybe from WW2 and maybe the Batman movie (just because it's Batman).
But if they do reboot, what exactly do they say about it? It's a PR nightmare. They'd either have to admit to screwing it up the first time, or admit that they're cutting their losses and betting on something new--which probably wouldn't have much faith put in it because of how they screwed the pooch the first time.
Use Reeves The Batman to do it.
We have heard what the audience has had to say, and we are listening. We want to bring these DC characters to life in a universe that the public will love, and were going to make every effort with a new crop of creative talent to make sure that happens. Theres always been a fantastic tradition of reinvention and recreation at DC Comics, and the new cinematic ventures we are planning will live up to that spirit and fresh creative energy, starting with Matt Reevess Batman project.
Simple.
We have heard what the audience has had to say, and we are listening. We want to bring these DC characters to life in a universe that the public will love, and were going to make every effort with a new crop of creative talent to make sure that happens. Theres always been a fantastic tradition of reinvention and recreation at DC Comics, and the new cinematic ventures we are planning will live up to that spirit and fresh creative energy, starting with Matt Reevess Batman project.
Simple.
But how do you reboot this whole universe when Wonder Woman 2 and Aquaman are coming down the pipeline?
Let's be honest, the DCEU as a brand is damaged largely due to the simple fact that WB has screwed up their two biggest characters: Superman and Batman. Wonder Woman works all on her own (it's downright staggering how her movie seemingly did nothing to help JL) and they're banking on audience's wanting more of this Aquaman. To late to turn back now. I also think that a Flash movie has potential. How do you move forward with those properties while giving Batman and Superman a fresh start?
So admitting that they screwed up.