• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

The Meg 2: The Trench

Blitzkrieg

Avenger
Joined
Jul 3, 2016
Messages
15,599
Reaction score
3,328
Points
78

This afternoon at the U.S.-China Entertainment Summit in Los Angeles at the Skirball Center, The Meg executive producer Catherine Xujun Ying acknowledged that that a sequel to summer’s shark movie is in the works.

“That is definitely the plan,” said Ying when asked by Variety’s Patrick Frater about building out the franchise during a panel for film and the future plans of The Meg 2 , “It’s still in the very early stages, but we’re working on it. We’re trying to keep it secret at this time.” Ying is the VP of CMC and CEO of Gravity Pictures who was involved heavily in financing The Meg which was distributed by Warner Bros. in U.S./Canada and a majority of overseas territories.

The Meg producer Belle Avery also is looking forward to sequels: She bought the rights to Steve Alten’s books.
 
Why make a sequel? Sequels tend to be more expensive and earn less, especially for poorly received movies.
 
They should include the scene from the book with the meg versus a t-rex
Unless the Rex in question was of considerably larger size that it actually is, the Meg would get an easy win.
 
Call it The Megs and be done with it.
 
Sequels tend to be more expensive and earn less, especially for poorly received movies.

yD8jyvpx_o.gif


But The Meg wasn't poorly received. It actually had a great reception in every corner of the world. It's world-wide BO haul is one of the surprise success stories of 2018.
 
Unless the Rex in question was of considerably larger size that it actually is, the Meg would get an easy win.

Yep, that’s part of the fun. Winner winner chicken dinner
 
This is the least surprising news about The Meg since the movie was a success. They have plenty of sequel books to work with if they choose to follow them.
 
And so many Megalodons and other prehistoric marine life features in the sequels. I'm currently on book 4 at the moment.

They should have made the Meg preggers like in the first book, because I doubt we will get "Angel - The Angel of Death - Two shows daily" and her numerous murderous progeny.
 
Did the first movie take lots of material from the book or was it more of a loose adaptation??

By loose adaptation I mean like taking the central concept of the book/s and then improvising and doing their own thing afterwards.

I'm asking because I thought Meg was very brisk in it's pacing and it worked like a perfectly streamlined blockbuster and it made me think that Turtletaub took liberties with the source material.
 
The movie was a loose adaptation. It held a lot of the same plot points but it also took a blender to it and the first sequel to make a half-way accurate movie.

The novels range from decent to WTF creepy and sometimes stretching the premise to ridiculous lengths.

The worst part is when one of the characters is
having an incestuous relationship with his daughter. Who has no idea she is his daughter but he knows it full well.
Yeah. It gets creepy.
 
I'd say a loose adaptation, with bits from the second book going in (like the billionaire financier plotline - that is from book 2, though that is far more elaborate and creepy in the novel and he is a total villain).

Not a lot of comedy in them, the character Mac is snarky as hell, but Jonas is quite a tortured guy. Books are rather serious, maybe a bit to serious. I'm not in love with either of the leads, both Jonas and Terry are kinda full of themselves. And so many people are so stupid, treating the Megs and other prehistoric creatures like they are garden variety animals. Of course, most of them get eaten in the end. The body count in the books is huge, and some characters live on book to be killed in the next one. Terry and Jonas end up having 2 kids, and books 3 and 4 feature them heavily as well. Book 3 has a great reality tv plot line that could be super fan to do. But y the end of book 1. they have a Meg in captivity, she becomes the world's biggest attraction - which the movie didn't do.

The basic plot is the same, but the details are all wrong. The Institute is Japanese, so is the female lead and her father, Jonas was first a navy submarine pilot who on a deep dive thought he saw a Megalodon and panicked and kill two crew members due to the compression of surfeasing to fast. He became an expert in Megalodons, giving lectures on them and his theory that they aren't extinct - everyone thinks he is crazy - Ancient Aliens style. He gets called to rescue the brother of the female lead, who dies in the Trench and the Megalodon is freed. There 2 Megs, the smaller male and the bigger pregnant female, who does all the surface killing and is killed but leaves 3 pups. 2 are eaten by other sharks and the one rescued is a female, Angel. She is the star of book 2 and 3. I'm on book 4, where we have her and 5 of her survivingoffspring, all females.
 
The Meg was terrible. Apart from a couple of cool scenes and tense moments, the rest of the movie, including the dialogue, was just bad.

There's no way the sequel is going to top the B.O return of the first movie, unless they significantly change things up.
 
Saw this last night. I was disappointed. Thought it’d be better after the reviews.

As to the question about how much is based on the books...very little as several have mentioned. Besides the names of the characters, this was a very light interpretation when compared with the books.

The books are much better and more entertaining to me.
 
Saw this last night. I was disappointed. Thought it’d be better after the reviews.

Very nice. Nao all you need to do is tell me where you got the time machine. I need to borrow it stat.
 
Last edited:
Very nice. Nao all you need to do is tell me where you got the time machine?? I need to borrow it stat.

I’m ur son from from the future and I just want to tell you don’t get your hopes up about detective pikachu
 
For that you needed a time machine? Oy.
 
I went in to the first movie with low expectations. I enjoyed it. It was the popcorn action flick, with decent CG (not great) I expected it to be. A few good scenes, some explosions. Stratholm dragged the movie down some (I've yet to like any of his acting roles), but he was tolerable.

I'd watch a sequel as long as they don't go full on SYFY channel straight to DVD quality. I'll just go in like with the first, with lowered expectations.
 
What's Happening With Jason Statham's The Meg 2?

Sean O'Connell asked producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura for some insight about what’s happening with The Meg 2. He responded: We’re working on a script. Yeah. So you never know until you get a good script. … I was very thankful that the audience got that we were just trying to have fun, [and] not take ourselves seriously at all.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,550
Messages
21,988,334
Members
45,781
Latest member
lafturis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"