The "Montauk Monster" returns

Mike_D202

Green Lantern's roommate
Joined
Oct 17, 2003
Messages
7,634
Reaction score
2
Points
31
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/ny-limont1412762172may13,0,500231.story?track=rss

It's back.

Just in time for summer, Long Island's latest fad-slash-biological freak show once again is in all of its bloated, pallid glory.

Reports of a Montauk Monster washing up on a Southold beach are circulating after the montauk-monster.com blog posted pictures and video last week of what looks like a beaked, four-legged animal's carcass.

Nicky Papers, 24, a culinary school student from West Islip who runs the blog, said a couple from Southold contacted him after they saw the carcass on the Founders Landing Park shore last Wednesday.

2008 LI marathon Papers said he and a friend drove there and saw a 3-foot-long animal corpse with a pointy snout and hoofs lying in the surf.

"It smelled horrible," Papers said. "It's like nothing I've ever seen before. I don't think the pictures do it justice."

Papers said the couple shoved the carcass with a stick into a garbage bag and took it to an undisclosed Southold location.

Attempts to contact the Southold couple were unsuccessful, and Papers said he did not want to reveal their identity without their permission.

Last July, three Montauk friends said they found an animal corpse, eventually dubbed the Montauk Monster, on Ditch Plains Beach.
 
Awwww...I remember last year when this 'news' first surfaced.

Memories...
 
Still looks like a bloated pig.
 
No matter which way you slice it, it's bacon.

I think there's a genetics lab hidden on an oil rig there.
 
Can't they run DNA testing on these things to find out what they are?
 
DAMN You Magneto
You keep doing human experiments, We Need To Stop him!
 
Can't they run DNA testing on these things to find out what they are?
It's frustrating that the skull is obscured by blobs of flesh. It's very clearly a mammal, but a fully-exposed skull or a more intact head/face would really help with the ID (conveniently enough, all we get are select few pictures).
 
It's frustrating that the skull is obscured by blobs of flesh. It's very clearly a mammal, but a fully-exposed skull or a more intact head/face would really help with the ID (conveniently enough, all we get are select few pictures).

And that's why I just can't accept this is a "monster" or "genetically manipulated animal." All we ever get is a couple of oddly positioned pictures and then the corpse is picked up and moved to some undisclosed location never to be seen again. Why don't these people turn it over to someone who can actually tell what it is. Cause it would expose it as a hoax...that's why.
 
That just linked me a sexting suicide story. Now I'm just depressed.
 
Leave it to FOX to give such attention to something so ri-goddamn-diculous.
 
3 foot long animal corpse? A snout? Hooves? Must be a goddamn monster. :whatever:
 
On a related subject: I'm about to cook some pork chops.
 
Maybe this is where swine flu came from...
 
wells__island_of_dr_moreau.jpg
 
Looks like someone may be killing dogs & dumping them in the ocean.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"