Dyson
Civilian
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
- Messages
- 704
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
I NEVER claimed that. I said the marketing is terrible. I said it's not like the Original, I said it is its own thing. I said I enjoyed it, but that it would never be as good as the original. I personally liked it better than Ghostbusters 2, but it is still a movie with flaws. Don't put words in my mouth please?

Mr. and Mrs. Slimer spot popped up online.
[YT]sTdByVnWomA[/YT]
Ugh.
There isn't a Library or a library ghost. There is an old mansion and the vengeful spirit that haunts it. That spook takes the Librarian's place in the story.
This looks fantastic:They hired bad animators. The CGI could've been great, yet everything looks dated.
They hired bad animators. The CGI could've been great, yet everything looks dated.
They hired bad animators. The CGI could've been great, yet everything looks dated.
Yeah, and it's sad, because really the scenes are brief and most of them inconsequential...fan service type stuff. I had hoped the Slimer stuff would be edited down to just the hotdog cart reveal that is shown in the trailers. The joyride in Ecto 1 was the worst part of the movie.Interesting that the marketing is playing on nostalgia, yet in this movie's universe the original films never took place. So they're harking back to movies that they're otherwise ignoring except for their nostalgic marketing value.

They hired bad animators. The CGI could've been great, yet everything looks dated.
He is a ghostly parade balloon from the past.Moreover, is Mr. Stay Puft a ghost? I would love to know why he's glowing like that.
Everything about this movie makes me
![]()
I don't understand. Are they twins? Why do they have the exact same facial structures? And if they're twins, why are they lovers?![]()