Homecoming The Next Spider-Man - Part 8

Status
Not open for further replies.
The better looking ones are as talented as the other ones, if not even more talented. Is that what you claim?

And no, Kodi, Asa and Isaac are NOT ugly!
Isaac and Asa are not ugly, however Kodi just looks odd.. weird.
 
Peter isn't suppose to be "Ugly", he's suppose to be awkward.
I think some people are mixing the two up and confusing them.
 
Why would a better looking actor be more talented? Explain this logic?
Are you just trolling, or what?

Why would an ugly looking actor be more talented?
Care to explain the logic behind that?
 
Why would a better looking actor be more talented? Explain this logic?
Are you just trolling, or what?

Reading comprehension is key! There are better looking actors that are more talented than those "ugly" actors mentioned in this thread, how is that such a hard concept to grasp? I didn't say they were talented because they were good looking so I don't know why you don't understand this.

You're still avoiding my other question, I wonder why :whatever:
 
Calling an ator ugly is just mean. You can think they're ugly but at least phrase it differently. For example let's say I wereto say Asa Butterfield should be casted. You COULD reply

"That actor is so hideous it makes me wanna carve my eyeballs out with wrench." or you could be a step nicer and say something along these lines.


"I respectfully disagree with your choice. I am not(or 'am' if you are) familiar with his work. I do not think he physically looks the part. However, if they were to choose him I would be open to the idea and give the actor a chance for he may surprise me."
 
AGAIN why does it bother you so much?
Because it reminds me a lot of bullying at the schoolyard. It's a terrible thing.

What good-loking actors mentioned here have more talent than the weird ones? Certainly not Dylan O'Brien, that's for sure.
Maybe you refer to Logan Lerman?
 
I keep imagining Dylan in the role.
When I close my eyes and think about future Spider-Man movies.
 
Because it reminds me a lot of bullying at the schoolyard. It's a terrible thing.

What good-loking actors mentioned here have more talent than the weird ones? Certainly not Dylan O'Brien, that's for sure.
Maybe you refer to Logan Lerman?

Charlie Rowe, Teo.Halm, Timothee Chalamet, Asa Butterfield. all good actors, all better than Kodi McFeet McPhee
 
Calling an ator ugly is just mean. You can think they're ugly but at least phrase it differently. For example let's say I wereto say Asa Butterfield should be casted. You COULD reply

"That actor is so hideous it makes me wanna carve my eyeballs out with wrench." or you could be a step nicer and say something along these lines.


"I respectfully disagree with your choice. I am not(or 'am' if you are) familiar with his work. I do not think he physically looks the part. However, if they were to choose him I would be open to the idea and give the actor a chance for he may surprise me."
Agree with you.

Imagine if Kodi, Asa, Isaac or someone else mentioned would find out about how harsh people are against them. Someone is called a weirdo, another one ugly, a third one feminine and gay-looking.
Even if it's unlikely, what if they would drop by to read some posts. Then they will see how much they're disliked.
They are not just being called negative things one single time. No, it goes on and on without any end.

Don't forget they're human beings with feelings. And on top of that, they're also teenagers and that is a difficult time by itself.
 
Last edited:
Why do you think ugly/weird-looking actors are the only ones who have acting talent? The better looking ones are as if not more talented than the other ones.

Where have I ever really stated that only "ugly/weird-looking actors" as you so delicately put it (:whatever:) are the only ones that have good acting ability?

The only thing I ever stressed was that they're more inclined to shine brighter in their acting considering people such as yourself get so hell-bent on the way one looks.

If one of the actors you don't like gets cast and gives a great performance what will you say?

Then good for him?
Good job on directing him to give a good performance?
Props to the screenwriters?
 
Because it reminds me a lot of bullying at the schoolyard. It's a terrible thing.

What good-loking actors mentioned here have more talent than the weird ones? Certainly not Dylan O'Brien, that's for sure.
Maybe you refer to Logan Lerman?

But you're not any of them, they're rich and have a great job there is no reason to feel bad for them, stop taking it personal.

Oh most definitely Dylan O'Brien not only because he has the looks and acting talent but because he actually fits the role. Logan Lerman is far better than the others as well.

Haven't checked enough of the younger ones but Dylan Sprayberry, Charlie Rowe and Nick Robinson would be better suited than Isaacs or Asa
 
Where have I ever really stated that only "ugly/weird-looking actors" as you so delicately put it (:whatever:) are the only ones that have good acting ability?

The only thing I ever stressed was that they're more inclined to shine brighter in their acting considering people such as yourself get so hell-bent on the way one looks.

I've only seen you support the "out-there"(subtle enough for you?) choices, its clear you're against the good looking ones even if they have talent.


Then good for him?
Good job on directing him to give a good performance?
Props to the screenwriters?

COOL now I know what Im gonna say if an actor I don't like gets the role :D
 
I've only seen you support the "out-there"(subtle enough for you?) choices, its clear you're against the good looking ones even if they have talent.

Yes, because I'm totally against guys like Charlie Rowe and Logan Lerman. :o
You've only seen what you wanted to see at this point.

COOL now I know what Im gonna say if an actor I don't like gets the role :D

Congrats.

I honestly think you're sore over me not liking O'Brien, hence your passive-aggressive posts toward me. :cwink:

Stay classy, though.
 
In all honesty all of these young actors have just as much potential to be the best Spider-Ma ever as O'Brien or Logan Lerman.
 
Yes, because I'm totally against guys like Charlie Rowe and Logan Lerman. :o
You've only seen what you wanted to see at this point.

You get overly sensitive over the other guys for no reason, but good to know you're not against those choices 'cause they're certainly better than Asa or Vincent Nutella.

Congrats.

I honestly think you're sore over me not liking O'Brien, hence your passive-aggressive posts toward me. :cwink:

Stay classy, though.

Why would I? You're in the minority anyway, Im more concerned with people supporting actors that don't have what it takes for the role, that's pretty dissapointing.
 
But you're not any of them, they're rich and have a great job there is no reason to feel bad for them, stop taking it personal.

Oh most definitely Dylan O'Brien not only because he has the looks and acting talent but because he actually fits the role. Logan Lerman is far better than the others as well.
So just because I'm not any of them, and they have a lot of money, you are allowed to call them whatever insulting word you want?

And this specific thing was about acting talent in general, not being suited for PP. Sorry, but Dylan O'Brien is not on the same level as some of the others.
I can bring up another example of a different looking guy: Thomas Sangster.
And he's a better actor than Dylan.
 
So just because I'm not any of them, and they have a lot of money, you are allowed to call them whatever insulting word you want?

And this specific thing was about acting talent in general, not being suited for PP. Sorry, but Dylan O'Brien is not on the same level as some of the others.
I can bring up another example of a different looking guy: Thomas Sangster.
And he's a better actor than Dylan.

Im not insulting them, its not a crime thinking someone else is unnatractive or odd looking and its also no reason why you should feel so offended by it.

So you're on the anti-dylan train? SHOCKING! Yeah Thomas is a great actor and looks really young, another one who is better than Asa.
 
You get overly sensitive over the other guys for no reason, but good to know you're not against those choices 'cause they're certainly better than Asa or Vincent Nutella.

Every actor should have a chance for the role, regardless of what you fanboys like to preach.

Also, when in doubt, make a remark because that's all you've got.

And you wonder why I ignore some of your posts, because it feels like I'm debating with a child.

Why would I? You're in the minority anyway, Im more concerned with people supporting actors that don't have what it takes for the role, that's pretty dissapointing.

Nice dodge there.

Honestly, who are you to judge who-and-who doesn't have what it takes for the role? Based off of what? Looks?

Get real.
 
So just because I'm not any of them, and they have a lot of money, you are allowed to call them whatever insulting word you want?

And this specific thing was about acting talent in general, not being suited for PP. Sorry, but Dylan O'Brien is not on the same level as some of the others.
I can bring up another example of a different looking guy: Thomas Sangster.
And he's a better actor than Dylan.
Kody is only choice I've out-right hated.
But Sangster is a terrible choice as well. how the hell is he a better actor than Dylan? Dylan played the exact opposite of his real life self?
Sangster was good, serviceable but nothing special.
 
RDJ just posted this on Facebook.
11029480_413287458839725_985566862457412955_n.jpg



What does it mean!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,398
Messages
22,097,268
Members
45,893
Latest member
DooskiPack
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"