Ben Urich
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2003
- Messages
- 13,771
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
ShadowBoxing said:Dude I study politics, and concetrate in racial politics. dude. It's only like the 100th time I've said this.
This year, according to recent polls we will have the largest influx of black representitives we have ever had, and largest increase in black state reps as well. Massachusetts is about to elect a black governor (46/33). Tenessee and black senator (48/46). Steele is actually 46/46 with his opponent. A total of 138 are running this year alone. currently about 50% of them are more than carrying those elections. 15% are tightly contested.
In fact black people in the South have successfully combined the well known stereotype of black christian moral values and the progressive nature of most Democrats/Liberals. To make candidates who both appeal to the value voters and local dems.
Clinton, baby...JLBats said:Warren G. Harding was pretty black.
Umm no, time and again polls and surveys have proven pretty accurate in determining racism. In fact if you were to survey the KKK (as I just had to) you'd find that they are less racist across the board on all questions. "Would you live next to, date, allow a negro in your home, hire, elect, etc." all showed positive increases, especially "live next to" which showed a dramatic increase of about 25%. Applying that to a general public, who actually used to show incredibly low numbers, show that race is not the issue it once was. Also considering how nearly at the "black races" this year are hotly contested shows that the determination is starting to dwindle.Matt said:Sigh, being racist doesn't mean you just join the KKK and say slurs.
Polls won't show anything either. These are things that people don't talk about, don't even think about. But time and time again, history has proven, it is there.
ShadowBoxing said:Umm no, time and again polls and surveys have proven pretty accurate in determining racism. In fact if you were to survey the KKK (as I just had to) you'd find that they are less racist across the board on all questions. "Would you live next to, date, allow a negro in your home, hire, elect, etc." all showed positive increases, especially "live next to" which showed a dramatic increase of about 25%. Applying that to a general public, who actually used to show incredibly low numbers, show that race is not the issue it once was. Also considering how nearly at the "black races" this year are hotly contested shows that the determination is starting to dwindle.
Even in Maryland, which is currently 46/46, Steele actually is losing black voters for running as a Republican, yet still holding a tight race.
Watch Harold Ford ads, you'd think he were the Republican and Steele was the Democrat.comicgirl said:Steele has been trying to play both side against the middle.
I live in PA; a lot of MD voters think he's a Democrat. His tv spots and road signs are........ambiguious
I know, WTF!?!?! That's our "cousin" Maryland.ShadowBoxing said:Watch Harold Ford ads, you'd think he were the Republican and Steele was the Democrat.
Yeah he is gone.comicgirl said:I know, WTF!?!?! That's our "cousin" Maryland.
P.S. - I'll be so glad when we had Santorum his walking papers! yes!
nah,nah,nah-nah......hey-hey-hey.........stay the hell in Virginia!ShadowBoxing said:Yeah he is gone.
t:
..oh, yes...that will be a good day.

Immortalfire said:His name sounds like a terrorist.![]()
Hey, fire! What's up, man! Come on, that sounds like something Dubya would say. What! Did you say Osama?!Immortalfire said:His name sounds like a terrorist.![]()

Change on letter to "S" and his full name would be Barak Hussein Osama.Immortalfire said:His name sounds like a terrorist..
General Wesley Clark would be great.BT18 said:First of all, the republicans already have all the racists votes all locked up (and no I'm not including anti-white racism which I know is the only kind the Hannitys and Savages of the world and their followers see).
But this is just endemic of the bull$hit that is celebrity driving politics, and just people not giving a damn enough to look into anything beyond what the corporate media feeds them.
Obama would make a fine candidate in 2012, but lets hope Democrats have an incumbant running then.
I can't even count the number of times I saw John Edwards accused of only having "4 years of national experience for president" and people buying into it, despite the fact that he was elected in 1998, giving him 6. What are they going to do with Obama, say he'll only have 2 years experience ? Hey, why not?
There are 3 people who would be great candidates. Apparently it's up to people outside of the corporate media to shove them down the throats of the unengaged out there, all of whom have a perfectly good chance of winning the primary and a GREAT chance of winning the general election the minute they announce their candidacy.
![]()
General Wesley Clark
![]()
Senator Russ Feingold
![]()
Senator Barbara Boxer
and by the way, I was a supporter of Obama before probably anyone else on SHH had heard of him, back when his main claim to fame was an inordinate amount of people signed up to his meetup.com profile, just starting out running in the Illionois primary in summer 2003.
This is all too weird. Beware of this guyShadowBoxing said:Change on letter to "S" and his full name would be Barak Hussein Osama.
Probably so. Some think he ough to try to get on board with the next Democratic candidate as VP, that might be a wiser choice. But he does have that JFK appeal.eat aliens said:I don't think Obama is bad for a democrat, I did like his speach at the DNC. But he hasn't even served a full term in the senate and as far as I know hasn't done much. He'd be better off building a larger reputation for himself adn run in 2012.
ShadowBoxing said:Probably so. Some think he ough to try to get on board with the next Democratic candidate as VP, that might be a wiser choice. But he does have that JFK appeal.