The Amazing Spider-Man The Official ASM Teaser Trailer Thread! - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Avatar was the best cinematic experience I've ever had (although I've obviously seen far better movies), I couldn't care less who agress with that, visually I hope spider-man looks HALF as good.
 
The action scenes in Avatar were fantastic, that's true, but I felt the story was....told already?
 
Let's not get into an argument about whether Avatar was good as a film, the point is I'm still baffled as to why people continue to believe the 3D was any good in it. It's always held as the highpoint of the format by default but even in that film it was lackluster, so my hopes for Spiderman aren't great either. Is it worth a whole film being in 3D for a couple of vertigo inducing swinging scenes? I doubt it.
 
The 3D was great in Avatar though...

It immersed the audience with an added sense of depth perception versus the stupid gimmicky 3D that just pops out at people.

The way it was used in Avatar definitely deserves to be the standard.
 
The 3D was great in Avatar though...

It immersed the audience with an added sense of depth perception versus the stupid gimmicky 3D that just pops out at people.

The way it was used in Avatar definitely deserves to be the standard.
Yeah, I know what you mean. It's times like that when I think 3D is good.
 
I wonder how much the theme of this movie will be about "with great power must come great responsibility"... I mean, the first Sam Raimi Spider-man movie was all about that phrase, but this time it seems to be about much more than that, like the "Peter searches his father but in the end finds himself" for example
 
The 3D was great in Avatar though...

It immersed the audience with an added sense of depth perception versus the stupid gimmicky 3D that just pops out at people.

The way it was used in Avatar definitely deserves to be the standard.

I disagree, I found myself more consistently engaged when I saw the 2D version. Seeing it in 3D I was always conscious of the format, therefore I wasn't immersed by it. The technology isn't nearly good enough as it stands.
 
avatar was the first 3D movie I saw where everything was 'going in' rather than 'coming out' I really thought I was 'IN' the world of pandora. I really hope I get the same sensation when I see the POV, that I 'AM' spider-man rather than looking at spider-man

also the cinematography in avatar was some of the best I've ever seen and it SHOULD have taken the oscar, good cinematography is good cinematography regardless of how it is achieved, be in practically or in a computer.
 
I already felt my stomach churn a bit when fell towards the ground. Imagine that in HD, with the added depth that 3D will give. Even if its not one of the greatest looking 3D movies ever, i think scenes like that have the potential to be remembered for a long time
 
Me neither. It's just Poccahontas in a new suit
 
3D can be awesome when they handle it well, Avatar was an example, with Transformers 3 i can easily say that Michael Bay was able to make a great use of the 3D (no, i'm not refering to Rosies ass jumping from the screen), but if they can make this work with spider-man it can be great, if the prespective thing is used only once in the movie those with 2D will find it fun the first time while guys with 3D will be even able to apreciate more the experience
 
I still think that POV could have been achieved practically.

*stunt man has camera attached to his head*

part one - jump over to the next skyscraper
wire rig

part two - running and then crawling upside down
running then switch to upside down set - join the two in post

part three - jump up onto the wall and crawl round to the other side
wire rig

part four - jump off building plung down to near street level
wire rig

part five - shoot web swing towards building
1. wire rig for the swing
2. make the glass building the floor and have the stunt man in spidey's outfit fall towards the floor.
join the swing and falling towards the glass floor in post. remove the camara on stunt man's head in post.

this would have totally side stepped the 'CG' look.
 
also the cinematography in avatar was some of the best I've ever seen and it SHOULD have taken the oscar, good cinematography is good cinematography regardless of how it is achieved, be in practically or in a computer.

Avatar did win the Oscar for Cinematography.
 
Didn't James Cameron's ex-wife win the academy award for a movie that night, lol?
 
maybe spidey can pick up an oscar for best cinematography as the images, even in a bootleg, are STUNNING. lets' face it, it's not going to get one for visual effects ha ha
 
So we're getting the trailer earlier than Thursday and today's Wednesday....

:awesome:
 
Well, we did for S-M2.

did ILM or weta have a movie out that year?
worth nothing that Dykstra who won the oscar for SM2 is now at weta, if there was a drop in quality for visual effects that was because he wasn't on SM3
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,398
Messages
22,097,289
Members
45,893
Latest member
DooskiPack
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"