Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]481881[/split]
That's why Cap 3 CAN'T be Civil war. I can see Thor 3 as the Ragnarok in Asgard storyline and returning just in time for Avengers 3.
Cap 3 would have to be a hunt for Bucky and something that leads to the Registration act
Civil War has to be Avengers 3. There needs to be some buildup.
I still don't see how Civil War works as a reaction to Age of Ultron.
Let's say the rumors are right, Tony retires after what Ultron does & Cap leads a new Avengers team.
Tony is taking responsibility for his actions by retiring and likely devoting resources to the country Ultron destroyed.
The government could do a resignation thing but Tony wouldn't get involved. Tony doesn't trust the government. Also I doubt Tony would force his teammates to be a part of this. Tony knows Ultron is his fault and wouldn't force the Avengers to be punished for his actions.
Maybe the government has dirt on Stark and forces him to be involved but that's the only way.
Also Tony going after Bucky doesn't make sense. YES Bucky killed his parents but Bucky was brainwashed. He didn't know what he was doing or who it was for. It's like Stark not knowing his company is selling arms to terrorists. If Cap tells him that I'm sure Tony would understand. This isn't like Joe Chill who willing killed the Wayne's or Zod/Brainiac who willing killed Supers dad and or planet in some takes.
If Rocket Raccoon or Starlord had already become as big as Iron Man right now, would Marvel ever have considered doing Civil War as a movie with Cap vs Rocket?
If Rocket Raccoon or Starlord had already become as big as Iron Man right now, would Marvel ever have considered doing Civil War as a movie with Cap vs Rocket?
WS v Rocket after he tries to steal his arm.
Civil War has to be Avengers 3. There needs to be some buildup.
You're not the only one who thinks so.Do you guys think it's possible that Variety was right on RDJ's Stark being in the movie but the movie is not based on Civil War at all? Like, was the guy who broke the scoop just jumping to conclusions assuming that since Stark is co-starring in Cap 3 that it MUST be Civil War? What if its an entirely original story starring Cap and Ironman together? I just don't see Marvel trying that hard to compete with BvS and doing a movie about "hero vs hero" a mere 6 weeks after BvS just did it.
Iron Man realizes he is overmatched against Thanos, and frees Captain America to be the leader Stark simply isn't.
However, there is no real way I can't see Stark going after the Winter Soldier. Yes, Bucky was brainwashed into killing Ma and Pa Stark. Tony doesn't know that. At least not yet. Nor could one say that Tony wouldn't be hurt by that enough to get revenge even though Bucky was under duress.
Will Captain America and Bucky fight each other in this?