The Official Justice League Director Thread

Discussion in 'Justice League' started by musclesforsupes, Jun 6, 2012.

  1. musclesforsupes

    musclesforsupes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    7,117
    Likes Received:
    0
    So should this film with a big name director or a small name director? Myself I believe it needs a big name director. One that can give the film some legs even before it gets filming. Therefore I go with my top three of..


    1. Steven Spielberg( If you want a big director I can only think of him and if they say this film will be going "Dark and Mature" then look to Steven's films to his credit for this)

    2. J.J. Abrams (Big director and look what he did for Star Trek, also I am a fan of Orci and Kurtsman whom seem to respect continuity and the characters they write about so would not mind them being brought in with J.J.)

    3. Ridley Scott (Again big name director, can bring the movie a big feel to it, just look at Prometheus and how that movie has been seen in the media)


    So whats your top 3?
     
    #1
  2. Ursa

    Ursa Villainess

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    0
    J. J. Abrams would be perfect.

    But he has a contract with Paramount, I don't think until when...

    They need a director who really loves comic books and this characters.
     
    #2
  3. JAK®

    JAK® Upstart

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Wachowski Siblings need to prove themselves again.
     
    #3
  4. Eddie Dean

    Eddie Dean Mr. Jackpots

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,950
    Likes Received:
    7
    Werner Herzog
     
    #4
  5. The Guard

    The Guard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2002
    Messages:
    32,349
    Likes Received:
    10
    George Miller.
     
    #5
  6. Eddie Dean

    Eddie Dean Mr. Jackpots

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,950
    Likes Received:
    7
    Oh snap.
     
    #6
  7. BH/HHH

    BH/HHH You Are My World

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    28,840
    Likes Received:
    20
    Even though I don't really care for him I think James Cameron would make a great Justice League film as would Steven Spielberg but that's never going to happen.

    I would love JJ Abrams but again I don't see that happening either.
     
    #7
  8. Kal-El.9859

    Kal-El.9859 Trust No One

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    11,872
    Likes Received:
    0
    a shot in the dark...I say Joss Whedon. steal him from Marvel. He knows how to handle a comic book movie.
     
    #8
  9. Llama_Shepherd

    Llama_Shepherd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    0
    Brad Bird.
     
    #9
  10. chamber-music

    chamber-music Infinity Ammo

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    34,435
    Likes Received:
    7
    It will probably one of WB regular directors like Zack Snyder was with MOS.

    If Warner Bros are going the Dark and Mature route for JLA I think Alfonso Cuaron would be a great pick.

    Cuaron directed Children Of Men, Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban and the upcoming Gravity starring Sandra Bullock and George Clooney.
     
    #10
  11. HighFivingMF

    HighFivingMF Welp.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    15,355
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cuaron or Snyder.
     
    #11
  12. Kal-El.9859

    Kal-El.9859 Trust No One

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    11,872
    Likes Received:
    0
    If Zack Snyder does a good job with Man of Steel I say let him have a go at Justice League
     
    #12
  13. DoomsdayApex

    DoomsdayApex Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    16,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Duncan Jones
    JJ Abrams
    Alfonso Cuaron
    Brad Bird
    Zack Snyder
     
    #13
  14. hopefuldreamer

    hopefuldreamer Clark Kent > Superman

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    This. Especially because i'd love to see Snyder's take on Darkseid :)
     
    #14
  15. Kal-El.9859

    Kal-El.9859 Trust No One

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    11,872
    Likes Received:
    0
    I mean he did a bang up job with Watchmen...so why not Justice League?
     
    #15
  16. hopefuldreamer

    hopefuldreamer Clark Kent > Superman

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed. But I've always felt I was in the minority with my love for how he handled Watchmen.
     
    #16
  17. Kal-El.9859

    Kal-El.9859 Trust No One

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    11,872
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought Watchmen was fantastic...very few deviations from the graphic novel
     
    #17
  18. Boom

    Boom I got nothin'

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    43,894
    Likes Received:
    66
    Brad Bird or Duncan Jones.

    I'd suggest Alfonso Cuaron, but I'm lobbying for him to direct the next Batman film.
     
    #18
  19. Llama_Shepherd

    Llama_Shepherd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    0
    Snyder could be great, but I'm not sure how I'd feel about him being the shepherd of the entire Cinematic DCU.
     
    #19
  20. The Question

    The Question Objectivism doesn't work.

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    40,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm against Zak Snyder. He's very technically gifted, his movies are very pretty, but he strikes me as being kind of dumb and shallow. Watchmen was very faithful as far as the details go, but the movie's tone and presentation was off, and I really got the impression Snyder didn't actually understand the book when he read it.

    Really, ideally, you want to hit the same points Marvel did with Whedon:

    1: Good with ensemble casts.

    2: Has experience with action and SFX.

    3: Is a fanboy.

    4: Actually makes an honest attempt to be artistic and say something meaningful when he does things (avoiding an argument: Not saying everything Whedon makes is super deep and artsy, but he always tries, and that counts for something, Avengers wasn't Citizen Kane, but I doubt it would be as widely well received as it is if it didn't have the real heart to it it has).
     
    #20
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2012
  21. The Question

    The Question Objectivism doesn't work.

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    40,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh, and I'd add...

    5: Is not a dumb person. Because all four of those describe Snyder, but again I don't think he's that smart.
     
    #21
  22. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark Armored Avenger!

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    11,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    J.J. Abrams can't direct a WB film. He he's under contract with Paramount.

    I'm going to list the name I did when this was under the misc films catagory.

    David Nutter.

    He's a guy that knows the genre from his work on Smallville, and has a ton of other credits under his belt. He won't pull a Martin Campbell and fall asleep at the wheel when the project runs in to trouble.

    Sure he's a TV director, but Joss Whedon was primarlily a TV director, other than his work on Serenity.
     
    #22
  23. JAK®

    JAK® Upstart

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    Snyder understood Watchmen. I read his 'Making Of' book and he demonstrated exactly what he got out of the comic. It didn't fit with my interpretation but it was valid. If anything his interpretation was closer to how the comic was viewed at the time.

    He is a very visual director who sometimes doesn't know when to stop but he has also demonstrated his ability to get great performances out of actors as well as being able to create powerful scenes.
     
    #23
  24. hopefuldreamer

    hopefuldreamer Clark Kent > Superman

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really think you should look beyond the way he comes across in interviews.

    I mean, seriously, you don't get to the position he is in being actually 'dumb'. Yes, he isn't the best public speaker. He comes across in interviews as having serious trouble getting across his point sometimes :funny: But I always feel like saying 'Don't worry mate, I know what you mean', because despite the way he's saying it, he is usually making a good point.

    He does fit all you're criteria. That's a much is clear to me.

    And yeah, it'd be a big risk handing him the entire franchise, and whether or not I think he could actually do it will depend entirely on how MOS turns out.

    But it'd be a lot like trusting Whedon in a way. Trusting the underdog. The guy who is going to work REALLY HARD to prove himself. Who is not so experienced that he's going to be inflexible, but not so much of a drone that he won't provide something that is tangibly 'his' in every peice of work he completes.

    :up:
     
    #24
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2012
  25. The Question

    The Question Objectivism doesn't work.

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    40,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wasn't basing my opinion on his interviews, I was basing it on his films that I've seen.

    Michael Bay calls that into question.

    Here's the thing: To me, he seems incredibly shallow. He seems to want to do things because they are cool without thinking about how it fits together in the overall film, how it effects the tone, or what it actually communicates to the audience. A major example is the soundtrack to Watchmen. All great songs, if it were a mix tape I would happily keep it in my car, but a lot of the musical segments seemed silly and out of place in the context of the film, at least to me. He didn't change a lot from the source material, but the things he did change said, to me, that he didn't really get what was important in the story. He completely changed the context and, by extension, the meaning of "nothing ever ends," which is arguably the most important thing in Watchmen which the themes and entire story hinge on. I get the feeling he didn't keep it the way it was because it was "just a line" and "could be said by anybody," and wasn't as important as the spectacle scenes like Dr. M in Vietnam. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how he comes off to me.

    And Suckerpunch, which he had complete creative control over, was a very stupid movie.

    I don't hate the guy, and I really like 300, but I just don't think he's a very smart director. And I think a JLA movie needs smart. Or at least, I'd prefer it.
     
    #25

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"