hippie_hunter
The King is Back!
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2003
- Messages
- 53,322
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Except Romney has already explained most of his former positions, even the pundits thought he did an adequate job during the primaries.
It's somewhat unusual for someone to change their view on virtually every position they have ever held, especially in the course of 4 years.
The Romney campaign said on Tuesday that its ads attacking President Obama's waiver policy on welfare have been its most effective to date. And while the spots have been roundly criticized as lacking any factual basis, the campaign said it didn't really care. "We're not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers," Romney pollster Neil Newhouse said at a panel organized by ABC News. This is a different standard than the one Romney himself has held up for the election-season ad wars. Reacting to attacks by a pro-Obama super PAC, Romney recently told a radio station that "in the past, when people pointed out that something was inaccurate, why, campaigns pulled the ad." The presumptive nominee's top communications hand, Eric Ferhnstrom, was quick to make the case that the two instances were not comparable.
Well, hell then who are you going to vote for? Obama doesn't care either....
Hmmmm....
Except Romney has been pretty consistent from 2008 - 2012. His flip flopping positions come from when he was running for Senate and his tenure as governor.It's somewhat unusual for someone to change their view on virtually every position they have ever held, especially in the course of 4 years.
- Obama's "Truth" Team claims that Mitt Romney would ban all abortion, even in the case of rape or incest. That is blatantly false, Mitt Romney all the way back in 2005 has come out saying that he supports certain exceptions for abortion like rape and incest, and he has even put out advertisements twisting Romney's position on abortion to make it come out as Akin-styled extremism:Name one of Obama's ads that are blatantly false?
Priorities USA Action is an extension of the Obama campaign, the same way that Restore our Future is an extension of the Romney campaign. It was founded by "former" members of the Obama campaign team, it has Obama's endorsement, it was founded to specifically raise money for Obama's re-election efforts, and the Obama team refuses to denounce the actions of Priorities USA, all the while it's reported that behind the scenes Obama is totally fine with the negativity that Priorities USA has stooped to (at least Gingrich faked his outrage at Winning Our Future).Mind you the dead wife ad is a super PAC.
Even Ryan has come out in favor of those particular, and rare, circumstances.
Even Ryan has come out in favor of those particular, and rare, circumstances.
Republicans emphatically approved a toughly worded party platform at their national convention Tuesday that would ban all abortions and gay marriages, reshape Medicare into a voucher-like program and cut taxes to energize the economy and create jobs.
Do I have a problem with federal funding going to sex education from 6th grade on up? Sure go for it....but for abortions? no...
I would need to look at the specific restrictions in the bill they sponsored together, have not found that yet....and as far as stopping Federal of funding of abortions? Which I do know was in the bill..... I'm totally for that, I do not think my taxpayer dollars should be paying for elective surgery....
Do I have a problem with federal funding going to sex education from 6th grade on up? Sure go for it....but for abortions? no...
The big how-do-ya-do about the bill with Akin was that it said "forcable" rape as if there is any other type of rape
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobil...ition_n_1837456.html?icid=hp_politics_top_art
Here is an article all about how Mittens Rmoney has flip flopped and changed his position which is not clear and is also different than what the GOP platform is and it also goes into the Ryan/Akin bill too
A mother should have the right to an abortion and shouldnt be up to an old congressman to tell her when it is ok.
That's just messed upA group of coal miners in Ohio feel they would have been fired if they did not attend an Aug. 14 event with presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney and contribute to his campaign —and to make matters worse, they lost of day of pay for their trouble.
In phone calls and emails to WWVA radio host David Blomquist, employees at the Century Mine in Ohio said they feared retaliation if they did not attend the Romney event.