Charlie No-One
iamamiwhoami
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2004
- Messages
- 7,531
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
The book is great.
yeah the picture is from an amateur production. I can't show the Broadway version. The Wolf is anatomically correctAlexia Dark said:Those are certainly... interesting costumes.
Interesting...Dew k. Mosi said:yeah the picture is from an amateur production. I can't show the Broadway version. The Wolf is anatomically correct
BRUTAL said:My fav has and shall forever be...
BRUTAL said:
A lot of people blame Schumacher for many things.Alexia Dark said:I hope he has hidden talent and learns really fast. One of the biggest complaints I hear about the movie version of The Phantom of the Opera is that Gerard Butler's voice wasn't good enough for the Phantom, though I disagree; he just wasn't given enough time for voice training. I personally think he has the sexiest singing voice I've ever heard, he just needs to work on it some more, to sort of smooth it out. I also think that the voices of the main characters were the best things about the film. The direction and the cinematography, and even some of the sets were what was wrong with it. And the cut lyrics and changed lines and so forth.
Ok, a heck of a lot was wrong with it, but I blame it on Schumacher.
ComicChick04 said:i bought the book wicked, but have yet to read it, is it worth looking thru?
Charlie No-One said:I thought the book was better. The musical was amazing but I think the book touched upon somethings that were very interesting.
Charlie No-One said:I liked some of the changes like the connections, but I liked the book ending better. It meshed better with the rest of the story.