It's funny... everyone I know (None of whom are Batman/Comic Book fans) are RAVING about this film.
People are going nuts on Facebook for it and having alot of fun discussing the ending.
I mean, just look at this poll as a small example:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/...t-rises-poll-what-did-you-think-spoilers.html
The general public seems to be loving it and it has great word of mouth. Even some of my friends who HATED The Dark Knight (calling it boring minus Ledger) can not get enough of this film.
That's because its better than TDK in just about every facet.
I'm still seeing people complain about certain scenes not being very realistic. Of course, these same people put TDK on a pedestal...the movie that featured a man who was referred to as Two-Face behind his back who just happens to have EXACTLY half of his face melted off later on. He then proceeds to function as an expert criminal within days of his injury...all without any treatments for the pain! Then there's Batman and Rachel falling off of a penthouse and landing on the hood of a taxi without being injured, and the whole "every cell-phone in Gotham turned into a Joker trap" craziness.
As far as gripes about quick cuts and hyper-editing...fans have griped about that with all three Batman films. That's what Nolan and Lee Smith do. They don't do long static shots, and they don't linger on any given moment. The pacing is relentless, and there is a method to that madness. If you don't personally care for it, I can respect your opinion, but don't pretend like that's something that just popped up here with this latest Bat-flick.
Unneeded characters? Another Nolan quirk. Inception and all of his Batman films try to juggle too many characters, some of whom you could argue really do nothing to advance the narrative. He likes to work that way, he likes a big ensemble. Nothing wrong with having a beef with that approach, just don't pretend like it wasn't happening in BB and TDK.
Overly expository dialogue? As if that's something new to Nolan's bat trilogy. Folks complained about it in BB and TDK. Its at a ridiculous level in Inception. For some reason, Nolan isn't comfortable showing us things...he wants to tell us. That's a sign of a tad bit of incompetence as a screenwriter. The characters are always explaining their motives, their schemes, their methods, their technologies. Why wait till now to complain about it?
It just cracks me up to hear all of this complaining about things that one should have come to EXPECT from a Nolan film years ago. Its almost like the film didn't live up to certain expectations (I was there in 2008-- I know how it feels) so a person points out all of the weaknesses that have been recognized in Nolan's films for a long time now, as if they are unique to just this movie.