M.E.H.Z.E.B
Banned Usèr
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2001
- Messages
- 10,704
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 58
Yup. It does. Don't think so? Vote in our poll to be heard. You know you want to....
guys...keep in mind what today is.
i don't even see how this is debatable.
i don't even see how this is debatable.
JAK®;19986607 said:This movie should have been a sequel directed by Bryan Singer. Only he would have dared to give us Zod, who the fans have been asking for for years.
i will beat that:Things that were EPIC about Returns:
1. Superman having an illegitimate child after abandoning Lois Lane for years (plus, no child support!)
2. Kate Bosworth's clueless performance as Lois Lane
3. Kevin Spacey being the most idiotic Lex Luthor in the history of time (Gene Hackman, eat your heart out!)
4. Brandon Routh's Chris Reeve impression.
Beat that!
i will beat that:
1. superman's incredible feats of strength, guy lifted an island made of kryptonite!
2. his fighting prowess, so tough he doesn't even have to fight
3. frank langella playing perry white playing frank langella
4. lex having the same basic plan from the first superman movie
AND
5. parker posey being in an entirely different decade than the rest of the cast
sexcellent poll, OP
I don't know how amy adams plans to top kate bosworth when she's like four times her age.
why is this also here. in the spider-man thread you made batman ownz spidermam now this.
anyway man of steel owns superman returns simply because it does not include kate whatever her last name is
no the wig agrees. that wig has not found a decent job since that movie
you're not very bright, are you?oh Lord...another poor soul who is lost wondering in the woods
oh Lord...another poor soul who is lost wondering in the woods