The Official "The Dark Knight Is Overrated" Thread.

Discussion in 'The Dark Knight' started by GremlinZilla89, Apr 17, 2014.

  1. GremlinZilla89

    GremlinZilla89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    0
    I honestly don't want this to be a flame thread. I really, really don't. These kinds of discussions can get heated fast so I ask everybody who wants to contribute to please be as level headed as possible. I know this film and series makes people feel strongly, but lets all be civil. Since it's release TDK has gained such prestige from seemingly everyone that any dissent towards it is either completely ignored or thought as just being attention seeking because the film is so popular.

    Believe me when I say I want to love this film like them majority does. It would much easier loving the film unconditionally like the masses but here I am off to the side, finding it overrated.
    I don't DISLIKE it. In fact, for most of the runtime I think it's damn good. But the films last act is the biggest issue. For the first 2hrs the film has me. It's exciting, unpredictable, suspenseful, and gives us interesting characters. I've always felt Bale/Bruce was stuffed in the background too much and Bale seems rather lost and bland a lot of the time, but it's forgivable because when he's in the suite I love it, voice and all.
    I won't even get into the utterly illogical plot points other than I accept them and find that Rises gets WAY to much flack for plot holes/inconsistencies when the finger can be pointed as easily at TDK but it gets a pass because, well, it's TDK.
    Back to the last act. The plotting of the film up to this point is fierce and perfectly paced. It's breathless without feeling like overkill or losing momentum...until it does. After the hospital explosion the film just goes into overdrive and extends itself too far too fast and just takes me out every single time. Believe me, I've tried to enjoy the third act over many repeat viewings but I can never get into it.

    The pacing just feels too sped up and they simultaneously introduce yet more political concepts and try to wrap up the plot at the same time. It just feels like overload. I never by the ferry scene and find it incredibly hokey. In a tonally lighter comic book film, one that isn't going for a totally realistic vibe, the scene would play better and I may not have an issue with it. But in this film it just comes off as hamfisted and forced. It would be right at home in an Iron Man film or Spidey film. Hell, it could be at home in a more fantastical Batman film...but something about it's execution just doesn't ring true.

    The biggest issue I have with it is Two-Face. Many people say Eckhart is incredibly strong and even steals to show away from Ledger from time to time. I would agree. He IS good. To bad the writing in the last act utterly deflates the great build up. I needed more from Dent. More hints at his breaking sanity. More little details about his state of mind or his past. Just one more scene like the interrogation of the henchmen would have done the trick. His slip into crazed maniac is the very definition of rushed. Not to mention he just comes off as a whiny baby. He anger just isn't justified enough imo. He went from mostly sane to completely crazy in the blink of an eye. They should have kept him for the third film.

    My last issue is more of a preference and nitpick, but it does bother me enough as to where I can't just ignore it. Gotham is too much like a regular old city. There are times when the movie really doesn't feel anything at all like a Batman film...or even a superhero film. BB gave us the PERFECT Gotham. It was just outside of reality but believable enough where you think it could exist. Rises also fares better on this front as it feels like a mega city instead of just...Chicago. A common complaint, but one I agree with.

    Like I said, I know I'm in the extreme minority here, but I'd like to hear from others who may agree with me and of course people who wanna bash my head in:yay: It's almost gotten to the point where I resent the mark TDK has left on mainstream film. Either films follow it's basic template, or fans want everything to be dark, grim, uber serious at all times and to be the next game changer. If they aren't these things they are somehow lesser films. TDK is a mostly good-hell, even great film. It's just the terribly rushed last act really kills it for me and it only exacerbates the smaller quibbles I have with it. It's not even in my top 5 Batman films...let alone top 10 superhero films.
     
    #1
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2014
  2. shauner111

    shauner111 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    16,103
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's because Goyer and Nolan intended on Gotham being a regular looking city all along. I think Goyer said that if they had their way, Gotham would have looked like TDK's for Begins. But as a story, i always see it as they're moving into the downtown parts of Gotham. Where it looks different. It's also been a year or so post-Begins and they've cleaned up the city a little bit.

    It never bothered me because this was always supposed to be a "what if Gotham was a real city in the United States like New York or Chicago". It wouldn't work in Burton's universe, hell it'll probably be grimier in Snyders because of Detroit. But for this im cool with it.

    There are people who want CBM's to be dark like that and that's not fair. Spider-Man shouldn't be like that you know? I do want to see some characters take a more serious direction though and im glad they went that route with the new Captain America. I think he has the potential to be a cross between Superman and Batman. Winter Soldier nailed that balance. It's something i think they missed on with the first Cap movie.

    But Spidey or Flash, or Iron Man don't need to be taken seriously for the majority of a film. That's the opposite of what should happen.

    Sometimes i feel like the Two-Face stuff was rushed in order to kill him off and close that chapter. But i dont think his anger wasn't justified. Look what happened to his face, to his future wife. If there was no pep talk from Joker in the hospital, i would agree with you, but that exists.

    What you say about the ferry scene is just not true. The hokey stuff you see only has to do with the extras and how they act. Otherwise how would that fit into an Iron Man movie or something lighter? It's extremely dark and deep when you think of it. Like Michael Uslan says, that was never done in a comic book movie before. A boat full of prisoners who have stolen and murdered versus a boat full of "innocent" citizens. Both are given the chance to blow the other sky-high to save their own ass. Is it right for the innocent to do that to those prisoners and guards? That wouldn't make them innocent anymore, it would make them even worse. Jokers counting on it and none of them commit the act. Even the murderers know better. Batman proves it to Joker, yet Joker shows his true colors when he goes about blowing them all up out of panic and disgust with the situation. That entire scene tells so much about humanity. Something fantastical comic book movies or lighter ones don't touch upon because it's not their job to.

    You will never see that in a Spidey as cool as they can get.

    I think Bale's performance is not bland. It's underrated. A subtle, quieter performance always gets overlooked. The nuances are all top notch with Bale in this one. Loud performances with more screen time does not always equal "better".
     
    #2
  3. GremlinZilla89

    GremlinZilla89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    0
    To each his own about Bale. For me it's not about subtly, Oldman was subtle and fantastic. Bale just seems bored stiff and the character just seemed underwritten imo. BB and Rises are much more Bruce-centric without losing focus on the side characters or plot, imo.

    As far as Two-Face is concerned, maybe unjustified is the wrong word. It's justified, I just don't buy into his transformation, narratively speaking. It's too sudden without enough build up. Like I said before, one more scene like the interrogation one with Dent would have gone a long way, just to get into his mind a bit more. I think he should have been slightly unstable to begin with instead of a perfectly sane man driven insane. The whole "They called you Harvey Two-Face" thing doesn't add a damn thing to his character. It's not given any context. It's just there.

    And as for the ferry scene, you're right about the acting. The concept itself is cool, it was written too on the nose imo and felt like it came from a lesser writer/director.
     
    #3
  4. Sterling Archer

    Sterling Archer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2014
    Messages:
    1,473
    Likes Received:
    0
    My problems:

    The sub plot about Bruce wanting to give up being Batman because of Dent makes no sense and almost ruins the film for me. For one thing Bruce states 'He locked up 500 criminals and he did it without wearing a mask.' but he completely ignores the fact that the only reason Dent was able to do this was because Batman went to China and brought Lau back. Also this is bad because it makes no sense that Bruce would go away and train for 7 years of his life just to want to quit after a year. But that is a symptom of my next problem.

    Another thing that ruins the trilogy for me is that Batman is almost entirely motivated by his feelings for Rachel when Batman should be above that sort of thing. In Begins the only reason he targets the mob is because she tells him they are responsible for his parent's death. In TDK he wants to quit being Batman after only one year just so he can be with her. In TDKR he quits for 8 years just because of her death! If I had my way I would have just had Bruce's childhood friend who becomes a lawyer be Harvey Dent and just not have a love interest until Catwoman.

    It's annoying too that Batman seems to have become much worse at his job than in Begins. In the scene with Scarecrow he tries (and fails) to cut into the back of the van and I have no idea why. That was probably the most pointless thing to try and do because Crane wasn't even in the back of the van! And in the nightclub scene some random henchman manages to knock Batman over the head with a glass bottle, if he hadn't been wearing a helmet he would have been killed right then and there and the movie would be over. That's so much different than when he managed to take out a group of several armed gunmen in Begins with ease.

    The thing that actually ruins this film for me is the fact that mere minutes after making a speech to the Joker about how he would never break his rule, he pushes Harvey off of a ledge and kills him! I could have been okay with this is it had been played up in the movie as a big deal that Batman broke his rule, but the movie just seems to not realise that Harvey's death was entirely Batman's fault. And it's not even like he had no other choice, as a ninja he could of easily snuck up behind Dent while he was holding Gordon's son and choked him until he passed out. Then they could have had a nice long talk about philosophy through Harvey's prison bars, but no he just walks right up to him like an idiot! This ending completely ruins the movie for me.

    I still think it's a great movie, but I can't enjoy it because it's terrible as a Batman movie. It's a shame too because I felt that Begins-Batman could have easily developed into a comic book accurate Batman, but he just got weaker over the course of the trilogy.
     
    #4
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2014
  5. CountOrlok

    CountOrlok Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    0
    I 100% agree about the ferry scene. The film just grinds into a halt at that point. You could make the same point a lot better.. besides it wasn't even given much development up to that point to start with. You barely know the Gotham citizenry and what they're capable of. The screenwriters turned a complex issue into an extremely simplistic one. Such an annoying scene, and the pretentiousness of it is unbearable.
     
    #5
  6. Fudgie

    Fudgie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ehhhh Bruce doesn't want to quit to be with Rachel. Bats said in Begins that his goal was to shake the Gotham peeps out of apathy and inspire them as Batman. He thinks Dent can be a better hero and symbol of hope for Gotham than Batman. That's why he tests him first to see if he's as good as he thinks by giving him Chinese guy Lau and getting him to put away all those crooks.

    Archer's complaint about one thug managing to hit Bats with a beer bottle when it doesn't even affect him is just petty. You gonna complain because Scarecrow just walked up and sprayed him with fear gas and then set him on fire in Begins, too, even though Bats had the drop on them heh?

    CoountOrlok must have missed all the Gotham citizen scenes before the ferries like the peeps going nuts and trying to kill Reese, or turning on Bats at Dent's press conference. You saw what Joker was doing to them. There was plenty of build up to the ferry scene. Oh yeah. And it rocked.

    None of these complaints you guys have said are legit ones imo. Soz.
     
    #6
  7. CountOrlok

    CountOrlok Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah but we aren't shown why they can be capable of being good, especially when the previous scenes show they lose their minds and become homicidal when threatened. Just the big black thug and the uptight guy who are just red herrings to make you think they'll detonate the bomb, but instead prove some kind of 'goodness in humanity' by refusing to kill people to save their lives.

    I've seen the theme - of hope in darkness and despair - done much better. The Crow for example.. it came through with the characters, not just random people you know nothing about, who are given less than 5 minutes screen time.
     
    #7
  8. spiderman2

    spiderman2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2014
    Messages:
    8,039
    Likes Received:
    19
    I do think that dark knight is overrated but still a great movie its just that most people think it is the best CBM ever or at least the best in the trilogy but i think it is the worst in the trilogy and that dark knight rise is the best in the trilogy and that dark knight is the 4th best CBM ever not one but all 3 in the trilogy are fantastic.
     
    #8
  9. Doctor Octopus

    Doctor Octopus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,422
    Likes Received:
    0
    All the best superhero movies get unjustly accused of being overrated once in a while. Spider-Man 2, X-Men 2, Dark Knight, Avengers and so on.

    The Dark Knight's not overrated at all. It's truly earned it's status as the best Batman movie and comic book movie. It's brilliant on so many levels. Nolan caught lightning in a bottle when he made it.
     
    #9
  10. GremlinZilla89

    GremlinZilla89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    0
    That seems to imply people only say it to be controversial or to go against the grain for the sake of it.

    Well the shocker is....some people just genuinely think some of those movies aren't that good! Nothing more to it. For me, The Dark Knight is a brilliant film for 2hrs until it goes off the rails with it's pacing and it's morality play.

    And for my money, Spider-Man 2 is the most overrated superhero movie ever made. But that's a different discussion:yay:
     
    #10
  11. CountOrlok

    CountOrlok Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    0
    You mean "earned" as in box office receipts. :o
     
    #11
  12. Fudgie

    Fudgie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nah we ain't talking about B'89 here. Even Burton can admit that was just a cultural phenomenon instead of a good movie heh.
     
    #12
  13. CountOrlok

    CountOrlok Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've never heard Burton boast about his successes, but he's not going to say "this is the best movie ever", particularly when it wasn't really his movie like Batman Returns was.
     
    #13
  14. The Joker

    The Joker The Clown Prince of Crime

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Messages:
    49,536
    Likes Received:
    88
    Couldn't agree more :up:

    And critical reaction, fans reactions, general audience reactions, impact on the CBM genre, and on non CBM movies like James Bond etc. I won't even get started on Hollywood alumni like Steven Spielberg calling it beautiful well written art.

    Not to mention the influence of the TDK trilogy itself on Batman comics: http://tdkinfluence.blogspot.ie/

    So sorry but your box office receipts mark holds no weight. If it did then Michael Bay would be held up as one of the greatest directors of all time. His Transformers movies alone have made a killing at the box office. But you already knew that.

    To be fair I've never heard Burton call any of his movies boring either, except Batman '89. He really did say it was really just a cultural phenomenon rather than a good movie, too. So it sounds like his opinion of it isn't very high as a movie.
     
    #14
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2014
  15. CountOrlok

    CountOrlok Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    0
    He said: "It's truly earned it's status as the best Batman movie and comic book movie"
     
    #15
  16. Green Goblin

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    5,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Leave Burton out of it. Previous versions of franchises have Nothing to do with the quality of the current version.

    On the matter at hand, is The Dark Knight overrated? No, it's the best comic book film ever IMO. Does it have problems? Yeah, so does every movie

    Since we are talking problems I didn't like turning Gotham into a generic US City but Nolan had his reasons even if I didn't agree with them. I think perhaps they suspended our belief too much with the Joker but he made a fatal flaw at the end so he's not "God like" as some of referred him as.

    An aspect the film did great other than Joker was Batman/Bruce Wayne. Bale was at his best and Nolan emotionally grounded the character to show us the vulnerability of Bruce Wayne but also the inner courage of Batman and the conflict between these two characters. By the end of the movie we learn that Batman will endure, and take the sins of others for the greater good of society.
     
    #16
    Last edited: May 12, 2014
  17. Victarion

    Victarion Iron Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    20,513
    Likes Received:
    0
    The scene were Harvey talks about Cesar in the first act. The scene where he loses it with Schiff. Two-Face was collateral damage. Something to drive home the idea that if Batman continued his crusade, there'd be similar tragedies. I think that the last act is supposed to feel rushed. Put yourself in Gotham during Joker's rampage. You're not going to get a chance to have everything explained. It would feel disorienting, hectic, and have a sense of urgency.
     
    #17
    Last edited: May 22, 2014
  18. redfirebird2008

    redfirebird2008 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,663
    Likes Received:
    0
    I definitely think TDK is overrated. BB was the better Batman movie of the two. TDK is a pretty good sequel though.
     
    #18
  19. Stryderk

    Stryderk Active Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2014
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know how anybody can say BB is better than TDK. I loved both films but there isn't really any iconic moments in BB.
     
    #19
  20. redfirebird2008

    redfirebird2008 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,663
    Likes Received:
    0
    I disagree. There are enough iconic moments in BB that the TDKR marketing campaign and film itself actually went out of its way to rip off BB numerous times. There are far more iconic Batman moments in BB than in TDK, which gave a lot more iconic moments to the Joker than any other character.
     
    #20
  21. BatLobsterRises

    BatLobsterRises Lobsterized

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    11,690
    Likes Received:
    0
    To me the Batman/Joker relationship is so essential that pretty much any scene with the two of them feels very huge and iconic. And even when you're highlighting The Joker you're still dealing such an important aspect of the Batman universe. A hero is only as good as his villains. Same with Dent/Two-Face. Because of that, to me TDK is every bit as good a Batman movie, just in a different way. It just explores such a quintessential part of the mythology.
     
    #21
  22. Human Torch

    Human Torch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    10,850
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is pretty much my opinion.When people act like TDK will never be surpassed,I'm like......I don't think it was even better than BB.But,whatever.It was still a great film,so I don't think it's praise is entirely undeserved.It's just when people act like it was The Touch of GOD that I'm like :whatever:.
     
    #22
  23. DOBSON10

    DOBSON10 Custom User Title

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2014
    Messages:
    1,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    Couldn't disagree more, it's the best superhero movie ever. But to each their own I guess.
     
    #23
  24. jonathancrane

    jonathancrane I love Marvel, DC & EC!

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    7,567
    Likes Received:
    0
    I find decidedly convenient that the Joker's henchmen were able to load all of those explosives onto the ferries without anyone noticing. However, my frustration with the Joker Ex Machina is nothing compared to the reconstructed bullet sequence, which throws science out the window. As a writer better than myself wrote:

    http://badassdigest.com/2012/07/05/basic-movie-science-the-dark-knight/
     
    #24
  25. CountOrlok

    CountOrlok Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think The Dark Knight is a good movie, but the hype caused by Heath Ledger's untimely demise coupled with his portrayal of the Joker character, really sent it way above the orbit of overrated and out into infinity and beyond.
     
    #25

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"