CFlash
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 16, 2006
- Messages
- 3,583
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Theweepeople said:I still can't get over how bad that script review of transformers was. Not every film that Spielberg had involvement with turned into a box office hit. However, he has never directed or produced anything that was pure trash. I hope his friendship with Lucas has not caused the quality of his filmmaking to deteriorate. The last thing I want to see in this film is an annoying character(aka Jar Jar Binks) who serves no purpose to the storyline and utimately ends up lowering the I.Q. of an audience with his or her presence. I have a shred of hope that Steven will keep this from sucking.
It's quite interesting that during the 70s and 80s there were numerous sci-films with good storylines whose failure at the box office could be attributed to poor special effects. In this time period the opposite happens quite frequently. There are plenty of sci-fi movies with great special effects that bomb because of their atrocious storylines. I didn't know it was so difficult for movie companies to find quality writers to write scripts. I was exposed to plenty of quality creative writing students in high school who were more than capable of writing better scripts than over half of the sci-fi stories Hollywood has butchered since the early 90s.
Because when intelligent sci-fi stories get put on the big screen they usually bomb. Case-in-point: Gattaca and A.I. Even when they're full of action, if they're anywhere near intelligent, they bomb. Case-in-point: Equilibrium.
Good filmmakers struggle to find the "middle ground" between being intelligent under the surface but not overtly. Then they're a success. Cases-in-point: Men in Black, Starship Troopers, etc. Other filmmakers couldn't care less and throw the dumbest stuff on the screen.... unfortunately they're a success too!!! Cases-in-point: Armageddon and Independence Day.