DeadPresident
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2011
- Messages
- 13,952
- Reaction score
- 1,131
- Points
- 103
Based on what? Woodward has been awful at his job the entire time he has been here, and at the same time has been getting the backing of the Glazers. They think he is doing a good job. The reason we don't have a director of football already is... money. The Glazers didn't think it was worth the money. And then we had an disaster of an offseason, where we spent very little money all things considered. An offseason the Glazers will see as a success.
Jose already said how bad things are. LvG did as well. What would Edwin saying something change exactly?
You are quick to complain about others seeing "disaster" but you being optimistic in the face of reality, does not somehow make your POV correct. If just makes you optimistic, while wrong.
You already mentioned the reason why they’ll do it and so did I in my first post; money. It actually makes more financial sense to have someone like VDS come up with a transfer and footballing strategy because it means less wasted money on wages and more opportunity to turn a profit on players bought.
If Woodward has been as awful at his job as you say then the Glazers will insist on a DoF because that will prevent Woodward making any more signings that loses the club money.
I’m quick to complain about unreasonable pessimism, mostly because this thread has transformed into a United group therapy session. My point of view is correct because objectively a DoF like VDS who has done a solid job at Ajax, even if Woodward doesn’t always listen to him if he’s appointed, is better than what we currently have and even that incremental improvement is better than nothing.