The other countries REVIEWS thread

Angamb

Avenger
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
13,348
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Well, I start with two spanish magazines reviews:

- From Fotogramas:

*** (3 of 5)

"For the lovers of the sequels without pretensions.

The best: the telequinetic battles
The worse: that don't contribute anything new to the saga."

- From Cinemanía:

*** (3 of 5)

The review stars this way:

"The exit of the director Bryan Singer is noted in this third delivery, while disappears the tone intimate-tormented and every existential reflection about those beings that are differentiated of the remainder of the humans by possessing endow special and in some cases inhuman."

"Verdict:

In spite of the change of director, X-men keeps as a good alternative to the typical-topic movie of superheroes. Descend the existentialist pretensions, but the spectacular sense rises. Without doubt, a great entertainment."
 
I have to desagree with something that Fotogramas has said: "that don't contribute anything new to the saga". What?? I haven't seen the film yet, but I can't believe this sequel doesn't contribute anything new. Come on!

First: the cure: Have you seen anything like this plot in the previous one?: Not.
2º: Beast: Did you know anyone like him previously?: Not.
3º: Phoenix: the same.

And I could continue, but I think isn't neccesary.
 
Also I'm disagrred with Cinemania about no existential reflection. How no existential reflection with the Cure as one of the main plots??

Really there are certain things that I really don't understand in some reviews.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"