Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]472065[/split]
Just my two cents on this:
She's not going to die, guys. Im postive of it. Here's why:
1.Marc Webb has been teasing it a little too much. I think hes just toying with us longtime spiderman fans. If a character is going to die in your film and you want it to have impact you dont heavily tease and imply it like theyve been doing. They would want to surprise people.
2. Lets face it, guys. If Gwen dies, the movie's going to end on a very depressing note and i really dont think Sony wants kids to walk out of the theater feeling dour. I mean yeah, you could still find a way to end the movie on semi triumphant note but Gwen's death will hang over the whole thing and it will feel like Spiderman lost. I dont see how realistically people and kids especially will leave the theater feeling good if they decide to go that route and lets be honest here theyre making these movies for younger audiences since that is how you make Avengers money.
Just my two cents. I really dont see this happening. I think whats going to happen is Gwen is going to come CLOSE to dying but Peter saves her. Then at the end of the film Gwen decides to leave New York for a better life. Peter ends up alone and this leaves room for MJ in ASM 3.
Peter had dated MJ off and on during Gwen's life and they were somewhat "friendly rivals" during that time.No matter how you slice it MJ should be introduced before Gwen buys the farm.The fact that she actually knew Gwen is an important element that shouldn't be ignored.If they kept the MJ scenes in,it would likely be enough.Again,anything else is just sloppy.
Maybe at most you can say that MJ not being introduced before Gwen's death is a missed opportunity, but saying its "SLOPPY" is just a little ignorant.
Peter had dated MJ off and on during Gwen's life and they were somewhat "friendly rivals" during that time.No matter how you slice it MJ should be introduced before Gwen buys the farm.The fact that she actually knew Gwen is an important element that shouldn't be ignored.If they kept the MJ scenes in,it would likely be enough.Again,anything else is just sloppy.
Thank you. Like I said, perhaps its a "missed opportunity," but that doesn't make it 'sloppy.'How about we see how it turns out before we start calling it sloppy.
The whole first movie was depressing and dour.You think the sequel will really be any different?![]()
![]()
^ I agree. For those who dislike the decision that they've made, a potentially 'missed opportunity' is the more appropriate term. You can't call it a 'sloppy' move without having seen what they'll do with the MJ/Gwen situation.
This is all I was really trying to say in response to "Human Torch." There is a HUGE difference between something being sloppy and something being a mere missed opportunity.^ I agree. For those who dislike the decision that they've made, a potentially 'missed opportunity' is the more appropriate term. You can't call it a 'sloppy' move without having seen what they'll do with the MJ/Gwen situation.
How closed minded are you, Human Torch? In other words, "if its not 100% like the comic books, its sloppy." Sigh.
Why did you find TASM1 to be dour?
^ I agree. For those who dislike the decision that they've made, a potentially 'missed opportunity' is the more appropriate term. You can't call it a 'sloppy' move without having seen what they'll do with the MJ/Gwen situation.
I don't have to see the movie to know they will be doing a major disservice to MJ (and Peter & Gwen) by not having her introduced before Gwen's death.She should know Gwen.She should see how much she means to Peter.This is a key element.And if Gwen does indeed die in this film and they actually filmed scenes with MJ and cut them that goes beyond a "missed opportunity" into the realm of sloppy.
They should always endeavor to stick as close to the source material as possible.But I don't think every change is a major issue.
I don't have to see the movie to know they will be doing a major disservice to MJ (and Peter & Gwen) by not having her introduced before Gwen's death.She should know Gwen.She should see how much she means to Peter.This is a key element.And if Gwen does indeed die in this film and they actually filmed scenes with MJ and cut them that goes beyond a "missed opportunity" into the realm of sloppy.
Once again, you are just being closed minded. You might as well just skip out on the movie then, because Webb is obviously doing his own thing. Making a good movie is more important than being faithful to the source material
It should capture the spirit of the source material, while giving a few nods and easter eggs here and there, but overall, should be something very original.It's good to stay close to the source material to a certain extent, but not everything has to be exactly the same.
Once again, you are just being closed minded. You might as well just skip out on the movie then, because Webb is obviously doing his own thing. Making a good movie is more important than being faithful to the source material.
You really don't understand what the word 'sloppy' means, do you?