$klaary
Civilian
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2007
- Messages
- 705
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Jesus Christ, are they MAD?I asked the costumer about it later, he said there was actually some debate for a time whether to even have the logo or not
Jesus Christ, are they MAD?
TEOL!But one of the funniest bloopers we saw unfolding before us involved Batman throwing the stack of money to Gordon. In one take, he'd throw it and Oldman would miss catching it. And it happened again. And again. And again. And again. The only time Oldman caught it was during a close-up when a guy o- set tossed it to him from short range. (Bale later joked it proved he was a bad tosser and Oldman wasn't a bad catcher. Oldman later said Nolan joked that he only caught it in the closeup to ensure that was the only usable take for the scene. A good acting trick, eh?) There were so many misses that both Oldman and Bale started cracking up after each miss. When Oldman finally did catch the money properly in a long shot, he only got about one line in the scene before Bale and Oldman started dying laughing again. Oldman literally laid down laughing on the table. So imagine Batman cracking up and Gordon lying on his side on a cart. That was the surreal scene before me and I was loving it. I hope that makes it on the DVD as a blooper.
I am cool with the "masked" emblem. I liked how it had the same colour as the rest of the suit in Begins. And that's because i like the all black suit.Yes, I said the exact same phrase when I read that.
I am cool with the "masked" emblem. I liked how it had the same colour as the rest of the suit in Begins. And that's because i like the all black suit.
The technique used in TDK suit (putting it in a triangle) isnt so nice, but its ok....i guess.
Not putting the emblem on would have been blasphemy. I know how they were thinking. He is a man dressed like a bat. What does he need a sign for? Not to mention that he is now a SWAT guy dressed like a bat, so maybe we need that emblem!
Wait a second.........the prologue mentioned here took place during the day and if those scenes involving Gordon and Bats take place at the Gotham National bank that would mean we'll see Batman in pure daylight ?
Hmm, if there was talk about whether to keep the symbol on the costume, then I would take that as further proof that the Joker will definitely not end up with bleached skin.
It's all good though.
yea he is an awesome actor but he seems like a really strange person.too bad they didn't make of Monique Curnen a Renée Montoya !!! But I'm excited to see her scenes, I love thoses "cops fraternity" scenes !
Oh and even if Bale is a great actor I'm ashamed to say his interviews are definitley not really worth reading for the most part ! Nolan and even Eckhart are much more interesting !
I really don't know why they changed the name. They could argue that this character is a different character all together, I suppose. But from what little we know about her (and even from her appearance) she seems like Montoya through and through. It's a shame, really, that that name change is taking away something that would have made the movie just a little more special. Oh well.What makes me wonder is that they changed Montoya's character so much, that they decided to change her name altogether. Why didn't they do the same with Flass in BB?
CS/SHH!: Is this like an extension of the Batmobile or is it completely independent?
Crowley: It's completely different component.
I hope that "arnarchy" take from Gordon isn't the one that makes it into the film. It just sounds incredibly off. Maybe it wouldn't within the actual context of the film itself, but I'd still just as soon have them use one of the takes where he doesn't say that.