The SUPERIOR Spider-Man - Part 1

so after TASM #700 the title ends and we are getting a new series, a new Spidey, with a new costume:


http://www.comicvine.com/news/dan-s...creative-team-for-superior-spider-man/145343/

http://marvel.com/news/story/19523/marvel_now_qa_superior_spider-man

 

he definitely improved since spectacular. But still, I think it's sad that spiderfans are stuck with his work when better artists could make a better job.

 

Stegman? I think hes fantastic. I kinda hope he sticks around for quite a while.

 

No, he's talking about Ramos.

 

Oh

 

BIGTIME that...

 

Like Mr Dent said, I was talking about Ramos. So far, I really like Stegman's art!

 

I love Stegman. One of the best up-and-comers. Still I feel like for whatever reason (tighter deadlines, inking) his Superior stuff isn't as tight and fluid as his Scarlet Spider stuff was. Still a huge improvement over Ramos who should be using his "talent" to paint fences.

 

So Giuseppe Camuncoli is doing the next couple of issues, right?

 

Sorry about that hehe.

 

Yeah, then Ramos.

 

Mark Bagley variant for #5.

 

My wiener just got rock hard.

 

Seriously. Great cover.

 

So weird seeing a Bagley-drawn Spidey with small eyes.

 

It's official now, I guess...Bagley's drawn it...

 

I really dig Bagley's art, but I wasn't too fond of his work on ultimate SM. Sure, it was good, but not as good as his previous spidey work imo. That cover, on the other hand, is amazing (pun intended).

 

I wonder if he'll do a stint on Superior? A Stegman/Bagley combo would be amazing.

 

kinda reminiscent, dontcha think?...

 

Yes, I do think. Right down to the pose. The Campbell cover is obviously better. Why is Spidey even posed so awkwardly in the Bagley cover? His right leg is just kind of floating there, like he's straddling the guy...

Is this meant to be an homage? If so, why? Is the Campbell cover really that iconic?

 

you're right, the Bagley leg DOES look weird there...

and no, I don't think the Campbell cover is iconic at all, I'm not even a big fan of Campbell, but I think it's just an unintentional homage... probably the cover was in the back of Bags' mind, cause it doesn't look like there's any "Bags after Campbell" acknowledgment anywhere on the cover...

 

I've seen the Campbell cover on alot of T-Shirts online....

 

ANY image can be put on a tshirt, but it's still not an iconic cover... unusual but not iconic...