CELTICPRED
Austrian Death Machine
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2008
- Messages
- 7,988
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 58
Your picture library must be expansive. Thanks.
Yo you might need to delete that lol.
Agreed. The light saber battle was weaker than any of the last three movies.
Kylo Ren was a Disney villain!
My favorite duel is episode 5 in Cloud City. I like the ROTJ duel Alot too, mostly because Luke's green lightsaber left such an indelible mark. As a kid seeing him ignite it for the first time... damn.
Anyways, I liked the duel from TFA, but it certainly has room for improvement. They lightsabers looked more dangerous, Ala the original trilogy, but the combatants seem unrefined.
I thought it was an improvement as well. I thought the duel in episode 4 between Vader and Obi Wan was laughably embarrassing. I watched it with my friend before the movie and actually caught myself wincing. The fight was better in 5, but I still got a very "big kids swinging swords" vibe. Episode 6 was better but I personally never got past the "actors fighting with swords" perspective in the OT. The fight in TFA, was better and I assume if Ren was uninjured, he'd been a little more impressive in my eyes. I'm sure they'll tweak it but, I just can't get past the OT duels being meh. Vader looked good, occasionally ducking, parying, and disarming, but he looked awkward holding the sword in my opinion
Agreed. The light saber battle was weaker than any of the last three movies.
Kylo Ren was a Disney villain!
I completely disagree. From a stage combat aspect, the prequels lacked one very important thing: Acting and emotion.
Setting aside the fact that the prequels had the most extraneous movement, and the most obvious cases of attacking at nothing, when you get down to it, fights in movies need to do one thing: tell a story. Good stage combat is like a good scene. It progresses the plot and reveals aspects of the characters involved.
The original films, while not as flashy, we're pretty good at this. Take ESB. We see Luke grow more desperate, continually changing tactics as he attempts to fend off Vader. And we see how Vader plays with him, and then how quickly he ends the fight once he's actually hurt.
In ROTJ, we see how Luke loses his sh*&t once Vader threatens Leia, and how his fighting changes once he loses control. Compare this to TPM when Obi sees Qui-Gon bites the dust. He just...fights faster. No emotional change, no story told through that fight. Just pretty choreography.
TFA went back to the OT in terms of its fighting, and as such, was MUCH more satisfying, and much better combat overall. It told a story with its fights, the combatants looked like they were actually trying to attack one another, and the fighting styles were very different depending on who was fighting.
Technically, visually, and artistically, TFA's fights were much better than anything the prequels had.
Yeah, I agree. I've said it before this duel really was well done. It tells a story, and is amazing to look at, but it's mainly about the emotion. Most of all out of any of the duels this one really felt like the lightsabers would kill someone. They did create something a little more fast paced than the OT. But not by much. They found that perfect mixture. Giving us a sense of feeling, danger and intrigue once again. Some of my favorite shots are from that duel.
Disagree on the emotion. There was enough acting and emotion in prequel duels. The only major flaw of prequel duels - they felt and looked TOO choreographed, sometimes to absurd level.I completely disagree. From a stage combat aspect, the prequels lacked one very important thing: Acting and emotion.
Disagree on the emotion. There was enough acting and emotion in prequel duels. The only major flaw of prequel duels - they felt and looked TOO choreographed, sometimes to absurd level.
Rey-Kylo duel was amazing. Best of both worlds - enough spectacle, but still looked like a duel, not a dance.