BatLobster
Trailer Timewarper
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2012
- Messages
- 16,523
- Reaction score
- 10,749
- Points
- 103
I watched TDKR for the first time in years the other night and couldn't help but compare it to what we know of so far regarding the new film coming next year. With The Batman's marketing campaign about to get dialled up a notch as it's release date is fast approaching, I couldn't help but wonder why Nolan opted for Bane as the film's primary antagonist, rather than The Riddler.
TDKR partly deals with the fallout from Harvey Dent's actions in the previous film. Matt Revees seems to be using The Riddler to expose a dark secret that's being kept from the general public of Gotham. I think The Riddler could have easily been used in TDKR to expose the cover up for Dent's crimes, being a more natural fit for TDKR than Bane.
From the looks of it, Paul Dano's Riddler is the closest we'll get to a Nolanverse Riddler.
I think it comes down to the fact that Nolan intentionally wanted to make a different film.
As much as I would've loved to see his Riddler, I think he simply didn't want to make a second straight film with a villain who plays "games" and sets death traps, etc. It does feel feel a bit repetitive of what Nolan did with Joker. I think Bane being a physical threat, and bringing in a militaristic sort of presence simply fit the vision for how Nolan wanted to concluded his trilogy (bigger in scale, war/disaster film) better than The Riddler.
On top of that, leaving the Riddler unused in film for decades gave Reeves the opening to lead with him as the main villain for his first film and have it feel exciting. Plus he's going full noir/detective with the film and it makes sense. Win/win all around IMO.
The thing I can say so far that Nolan and Reeves have in common is I think they chose villains that organically fit the stories they want to tell.
