Eddie Dean
Jokerfied
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2005
- Messages
- 17,037
- Reaction score
- 11,346
- Points
- 103
So are they just totally going to ignore him in this version of Spider-Man or what?
*shotUncle Ben has been done to...death
He had been Spider-man for 6 months before we met him. I think he pretty much mourned him.
The way I see the films, there just wasn't an uncle Ben that motivated Peter to turn into a Spider-Man.I didn't see it, it didn't happen. It's called show, not tell.
I never understood this fascination with needing to reference Uncle Ben all the time. Yea I get it, he's a vital part of why Peter does what he does, but he doesn't need to come up all the time. You pick up a random issue from the comics and chances are there is zero references to Ben. Its the same with Batman, I don't need hear a conversation about his parents or some flashback showing falling pearls every time there's a Batman movie. We all know why he does what he does.
Maybe there was, but a hint/small reference or an easter egg is something casual audiences can easily missed. I have Civil War/Homecoming in physical and have just seen Infinity War in a theater last month. As far as I'm concerned, Uncle Ben is a no factor to the MCU Spidey. Its been 4 films, counting Endgame. Would that change in Far from Home, I doubt it.
You haven't read a single word of my post, did you? I personally didn't say he had to be referenced all the time, or even more than once.