The Worst Movies of the year...So Far. (Ebert & Reoper)

Shuley

Sidekick
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
3,320
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Saw this episode of Ebert and Reoper where they talk about the worst movies of the year,so far. And so far I have to agree.

The Pink Panther
London
Hoot
The Hills Have Eyes
Faliure To Launch
Basic Instinct 2
Nacho Liber
Just My Luck
RV
 
I liked Nacho and RV.
 
Of big movies that were at least expected to be good, I'd agree they are the worst.
 
Leto Atrides said:
Of big movies that were at least expected to be good, I'd agree they are the worst.

yeah, 'cause the absense of Bloodrayne and Ultraviolent really sticks out for me.

I've only seen London out of this list, and while I'll agree there's absolutely no plot (not one that makes a lick of sense), I enjoyed the performances. Chris Evans and Jason Statham played off of each oher very well.
 
Shuley said:
Saw this episode of Ebert and Reoper where they talk about the worst movies of the year,so far. And so far I have to agree.

The Pink Panther
London
Hoot
The Hills Have Eyes
Faliure To Launch
Basic Instinct 2
Nacho Liber
Just My Luck
RV
LOL!....i only saw ONE of those bad movies!!.....i choose the good ones:up: :D

basic instinct was a stylish porno.............better than hostel though:down
 
KenK said:
yeah, 'cause the absense of Bloodrayne and Ultraviolent really sticks out for me.

I've only seen London out of this list, and while I'll agree there's absolutely no plot (not one that makes a lick of sense), I enjoyed the performances. Chris Evans and Jason Statham played off of each oher very well.
bloodrayne came out this year??????


WHY ISNT IT ON THE LIST?!!?!?!!
 
Because even Ebert couldn't care to watch it?
 
xwolverine2 said:
bloodrayne came out this year??????


WHY ISNT IT ON THE LIST?!!?!?!!

I believe it wasn't shown to critics?
 
Hills Have Eyes and Failure to Launch were decent at the very least...
 
Shuley said:
I believe it wasn't shown to critics?
SO!? its not like they cant watch it normally and review it on release........


uwe boll is the worste filmaker of all time and should be on that list!!! NO EXCUSES!!:o
 
^Except for the fact that Nacho Libre sucked.
The Hills Have Eyes was good but since it was horror, it had to get bad reviews from critics.
 
They put The Hills Have Eyes there, easily the best movie of the year.
When the worst film to be released this year opens, they'll probably laud it. That's their usual pattern.
 
xwolverine2 said:

cough_syrup.jpg
 
Majik1387 said:
^Except for the fact that Nacho Libre sucked.
The Hills Have Eyes was good but since it was horror, it had to get bad reviews from critics.

You pissed him off and now he's coming for you... :(

da-big-nacho.jpg
 
Majik1387 said:
^Except for the fact that Nacho Libre sucked.
The Hills Have Eyes was good but since it was horror, it had to get bad reviews from critics.
i wanted to see that movie.... it looks good.

but nacho sucked gammy..........so did napoleon wastatime
 
LOL Napoleon Wastatime :up:
You make me laugh with your wit so much, I cry!


























































































(Warning: Laugh is fake, but tears are real :()
 
I only saw part of The Pink Panther, and it looked positively awful. They got at least that part of the list right.
 
Shuley said:
Saw this episode of Ebert and Reoper where they talk about the worst movies of the year,so far. And so far I have to agree.

The Pink Panther
London
Hoot
The Hills Have Eyes
Faliure To Launch
Basic Instinct 2
Nacho Liber
Just My Luck
RV

It was stupid and silly, but in a fun way. At least imo, anyway. And I haven't seen the old pink panther flicks.
 
Gammy v.2 said:
You pissed him off and now he's coming for you... :(

da-big-nacho.jpg
Bring it.:o

I wasnt a fan of Napolean Dynamite at all. I stopped watching after the first hour. I wouldn't say it's one of the worst movies though.
 
Libre did not suck! Screw Ebert, is he not also the same person who said "I didn't get what supposed to be so funny about Napolean Dynamite"...I heard London was good and The Hills Have Eyes rocked!
 
Fanticon said:
Libre did not suck! Screw Ebert, is he not also the same person who said "I didn't get what supposed to be so funny about Napolean Dynamite"...I heard London was good and The Hills Have Eyes rocked!

The problem with these horror movies is that it's nothing but a gross out and that's all they are,no plot,weak acting and crappy dialogue. 99% of the comedies and horror movies are terrible,but people rush to go see them.Rather watch a Bogart or a Hitchcock film instead.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"