Wrong, wrong, wrong. I agree with the Zelda thing, to an extent... Though, I'd rather have Fable 2 than the new Zelda at this point.
Dude...Zelda has always been and always be superior to Fable. How the hell can you look more forward to Fable 2, to the next entry in the Legend of Zelda franchise.
ME crushes Mario in story, atmosphere, etc... SMG is fun, but ME is just better on a quality level.
Mario is not meant to be about story, it's supposed to be simple. A plumber in the Mushroom Kingdom goes off to save the princess for the millionth time to get some poon. The end. The only reason why I put those two together is because they were the only games left
.
But the Mario franchise with games like Super Mario Bros. 3, Super Mario World, Super Mario 64, Super Mario Galaxy, Mario Kart, and Paper Mario, it just pwns Mass Effect.
Bioshock destroys Metroid in every way possible. Controls, fun factor, story, atmosphere, protagonist, you name it.
Bioshock may be the superior FP game to Metroid, but Metroid is so much more than just an FP game. It can be a platformer too, and who else knows what else you can do with it. Do you really think they'll take Bioshock into other genres like they did with Metroid? I think not.
Also Samus is just plain kick ash.
And I read the GI review of RE 4 for the Wii, and they said the controls were wonky. They said it was better than the tank-like controls of the predecessors, but they had plenty of room to get better. Take that as you will.
Funny, I found the controls to be very smooth and far superior to the Gamecube and Playstation 2 controls. And pretty much every other reviewer (Famitsu, IGN, Gamespot, NGamer) stated that the controls were great. They all pretty much agree that the Wii version of Resident Evil 4.
A million Mario/Zelda games can't compare to IPs like ME, Bioshock, Fallout, Deus Ex, etc.
Hellz no